Literature Collection

BACKGROUND: The continued escalation of opioid use disorder (OUD) calls for heightened vigilance to implement evidence-based care across the US. Rural care providers and patients have limited resources, and a number of barriers exist that can impede necessary OUD treatment services. This paper reports the design and protocol of an implementation study seeking to advance availability of medication assisted treatment (MAT) for OUD in rural Pennsylvania counties for patients insured by Medicaid in primary care settings. METHODS: This project was a hybrid implementation study. Within a chronic care model paradigm, we employed the Framework for Systems Transformation to implement the American Society for Addiction Medicine care model for the use of medications in the treatment of OUD. In partnership with state leadership, Medicaid managed care organizations, local care management professionals, the Universities of Pittsburgh and Utah, primary care providers (PCP), and patients; the project team worked within 23 rural Pennsylvania counties to engage, recruit, train, and collaborate to implement the OUD service model in PCP practices from 2016 to 2019. Formative measures included practice-level metrics to monitor project implementation, and outcome measures involved employing Medicaid claims and encounter data to assess changes in provider/patient-level OUD-related metrics, such as MAT provider supply, prevalence of OUD, and MAT utilization. Descriptive statistics and repeated measures regression analyses were used to assess changes across the study period. DISCUSSION: There is an urgent need in the US to expand access to high quality, evidence-based OUD treatment-particularly in rural areas where capacity is limited for service delivery in order to improve patient health and protect lives. Importantly, this project leverages multiple partners to implement a theory- and practice-driven model of care for OUD. Results of this study will provide needed evidence in the field for appropriate methods for implementing MAT among a large number of rural primary care providers.

Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) is an evidence based practice that provides early integrated intervention and treatment to patients with Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) and/or Substance Use Disorders (SUD). Three Primary Care Medical Homes (PCMHs) in North Texas were selected as pilot sites for a SAMHSA grant designed to integrate SBIRT into existing services. The goal of this program is to support the stabilization and community reintegration of individuals who present with SUD in our community by providing them with a continuum of care from screening, brief intervention, brief treatment, and referral to services. Specific aims of the grant included: provide SBIRT services to eligible participants, decrease in substance and alcohol use at 6-month follow-up, improve patient physical and behavioral health measured at 6 months, and decrease in Emergency Department visits and costs for program participants. This brief report examines project design, outlines our implementation strategies and offers preliminary results.

BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic studies commonly recommend the integration of harm reduction programs with health and social services to improve the well-being of persons who inject drugs (PWIDs). This study identified service utilization clusters for PWIDs attending a syringe exchange program (SEP) in 2017 to better understand in-house service usage. METHODS: We applied Multiple Correspondence Analysis and Hierarchical Clustering on Principal Components to classify 475 PWIDs into clusters using anonymized, SEP records data from New York. Multinomial logistic regression was used to identify sociodemographic and program engagement correlates of cluster membership. RESULTS: Only 22% of participants utilized at least one service. We identified three clusters of service utilization defined by 1) Nonuse; 2) Support, Primary Care, & Maintenance service use; and 3) HIV/STD, Support, Primary Care, & Maintenance service use. Cluster 2 members were less likely to be living alone compared to Cluster 1 (AOR = 0.08, 95% CI: 0.04, 0.17) while Cluster 3 members were less likely to be White (AOR = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.07, 0.50) or living alone (AOR = 0.16, 95% CI: 0.06, 0.44) and more likely to be Medicaid recipients (AOR = 2.89, 95% CI: 1.01, 8.36) compared to Cluster 1. Greater than one SEP interaction, lower syringe return ratios, and being a long-term client increased the odds of service utilization. DISCUSSION: Overall, PWID clients had a low prevalence of in-house service use particularly those who live alone. However, higher service utilization was observed among more vulnerable populations (i.e., non-White and LGBT). Future research is needed to profile services used outside of the SEP.