Literature Collection

INTRODUCTION: There is considerable need for effective and accessible treatment for opioid use disorder. AIMS: Our study explored differences in buprenorphine treatment retention and duration, with a focus on selected sociodemographic factors and treatment indicators, in two different settings: an office-based buprenorphine induction and stabilization clinic (OBIC) and a community-based primary care clinic (CPC). METHOD: This nonexperimental retrospective chart review compared demographic information and buprenorphine treatment details, including treatment retention and duration. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in buprenorphine treatment indicators between the OBIC and CPC groups, with two exceptions: the number of written buprenorphine prescriptions was significantly greater for the OBIC group, as was the number of filled buprenorphine prescriptions. CONCLUSIONS: Given similar treatment retention and duration in two different buprenorphine treatment settings, our findings suggest that access to buprenorphine treatment in standard integrated care settings can be supplemented by novel treatment structures such as the OBIC in order to increase access to care during the current opioid epidemic.

Neonatal opiate withdrawal syndrome (NOWS), previously known as neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS), is a growing public health concern as opiate misuse and opioid-related overdoses, from both prescription and illicit sources, continue to rise in the USA. As more than 90% of females abusing opioids are of child-bearing age, the failure to adequately address the opioid epidemic continues to negatively impact the next generations. Accurate and timely identification of infants at risk for withdrawal from in-utero exposure is critical to ensure high-quality perinatal and neonatal care. Beginning with an evaluation of current best practices and performing a literature review, we identify the challenges to current screening processes and how these limitations limit the ability to provide appropriate care to infants at the risk of withdrawal. We first describe the limitations of the available assays for the detection of opioid and opioid metabolites across different biological sources from both the mother and the infant. We then present a discussion surrounding factors that contribute to maternal willingness to disclose use. Particularly, in light of the limitations of biological screening, any barrier to maternal disclosure further complicates effective care delivery. Barriers to disclosure include legal ramifications and state policies, provider and societal behaviors and biases, and maternal factors. Moving forward, universal prenatal screening surveys coupled with enhanced outreach and education to providers centering on the limitations of both patient report and biological sampling, as well as comprehensive and supportive services for women of reproductive age with substance use disorders, are needed to both enhance detection for NOWS and improve long-term maternal-child health.

OBJECTIVES: To explore how primary care providers report discussing substance use with transgender and gender diverse (TGD) adult patients within the context of discussing gender-affirming interventions. METHODS: Between March and April 2022, in-depth, semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 15 primary care providers who care for TGD patients in the Northeastern US. Thematic analysis was used to analyze interview data and identify themes. RESULTS: Two primary themes emerged among providers: 1) placing a focus on harm reduction, emphasizing reducing negative consequences of substance use, and 2) using access to gender-affirming interventions as an incentive for patients to change their substance use patterns. CONCLUSIONS: Focusing on harm reduction can emphasize reducing potential adverse outcomes while working with TGD patients towards their gender-affirmation goals. Future research should explore varying approaches to how substance use is discussed with TGD patients, as well as the interpretation of gender-affirming clinical guidelines. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Findings from this study indicate a need for enhancing provider knowledge around the appropriate application of gender-affirming care guidelines. Investing in training efforts to improve gender-affirming care is critical for encouraging approaches that prioritize harm reduction and do not unnecessarily prevent access to gender-affirming interventions.

INTRODUCTION: Opioid use disorder (OUD) is a debilitating illness that remains a serious public health issue in the United States. Use of telemedicine to deliver medications for the treatment of OUD (MOUD) was limited until the confluence of the COVID-19 and opioid addiction epidemics in spring 2020. Starting in spring 2020, the Department of Veterans Health Affairs (VHA) transitioned from in-person to mostly telemedicine-delivered OUD care to reduce COVID-19 transmission among veterans and providers. To gain a nuanced understanding of provider perspectives on MOUD care delivery using telemedicine, we conducted semi-structured interviews with VHA providers who were using telehealth to deliver MOUD care. METHODS: We conducted semi-structed Zoom interviews with VA clinicians at nine VA Medical Centers (VAMCs) in eight states. Potential study participants were identified as providers who were involved in referrals and provision of buprenorphine treatment for chronic pain and opioid addiction. Audio-recordings of all interviews were transcribed and entered into Atlas. Ti qualitative analysis software. The study team analyzed the transcripts for major themes related to tele-prescribing practices for buprenorphine. RESULTS: Twenty-three VA providers participated in the study, representing 32% of all providers invited to participate in the study. The research team identified the following four themes: (1) COVID-19 spurred a seismic shift in OUD treatment; (2) Video calls provided a rare window into veterans' lives; (3) Providers experienced numerous challenges to virtual visits; and (4) Providers wrestled with paternalism and trust. CONCLUSIONS: The pandemic accelerated the movement toward harm reduction approaches. Prior to the pandemic, stringent requirements existed for patients receiving MOUD care. Providers in this study reflected on the need for these requirements (e.g., in-person visits, toxicology screens) and how reducing this monitoring implied more trust in patients' autonomous decisions. Providers' observation that videoconferencing offered them a window into patients' lives may offer some ways to improve rapport, and research should explore how best to incorporate the additional information conveyed in virtual visits.

The need for mental health care for pediatric patients outstrips the supply, especially in states, like Kansas, that experience shortages of mental health professionals. Pediatric mental health care access programs, like KSKidsMAP (Kansas Kids Mental health Access Program), increase access to care by building competence and confidence in primary care physicians and clinicians (PCPs) through a statewide integrated system that includes a consultation line. This study is a secondary analysis of KSKidsMAP consultation Line inquiries regarding patients aged 0 to 21 years with mental and behavioral health concerns. The study employs a mixed-method approach with descriptive statistics and thematic analysis of inquiries. Five themes were identified: (1) pharmacotherapy, (2) diagnostic evaluation, (3) community resources, (4) psychotherapy, and (5) other. This study sheds light on PCPs needs and illustrates the importance of Pediatric Mental Health Care Access programs offering interprofessional expertise to consulting PCPs, allowing for expansion of pediatric mental illness care into the primary care setting.

Culture, tradition, structural violence, and mental health-related stigma play a major role in global mental health for refugees. Our aim was to understand what factors determine the success or failure of community-based psychotherapy for trauma-affected refugees and discuss implications for primary health care programs. Using a systematic realist-informed approach, we searched five databases from 2000 to 2018. Two reviewers independently selected RCTs for inclusion, and we contacted authors to obtain therapy training manuals. Fifteen articles and 11 training manuals met our inclusion criteria. Factors that improved symptoms of depression, anxiety, and PTSD included providing culturally adapted care in a migrant-sensitive setting, giving a role to other clinical staff (task-shifting), and intervention intensity. Precarious asylum status, constraining program monitoring requirements, and diverse socio-cultural and gender needs within a setting may reduce the effectiveness of the program. Primary care programs may enable community based mental health care and may reduce mental health-related stigma for refugees and other migrants. More research is needed on the cultural constructs of distress, programs delivered in primary care, and the role of cultural and language interpretation services in mental health care.