Literature Collection

Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) are relatively common but poorly understood and often misdiagnosed as epilepsy, which can lead to unnecessary procedures and treatments along with the possibility of failure to engage patients in necessary behavioral health care. Despite a superficial resemblance to epilepsy, in PNES, the underlying cause has long been considered to be psychological. However, increasingly integrated theories of causation invoking genetics, environmental factors, temperament, and early childhood experiences are being proposed. Rarely is a nonepileptic event intentional, in which case it could be due to factitious disorder or malingering, but by definition, PNES themselves are never intentional. "Pseudoseizure" is a now-outmoded term for paroxysmal events that appear to be epileptic seizures but do not arise from the abnormal excessive synchronous cortical activity that defines an epileptic seizure. Patients and healthcare practitioners alike are prone to misinterpret "pseudoseizure" as indicating that the patient is "faking" or otherwise feigning the events when, in fact, the events are involuntary behavioral responses to underlying psychological triggers or stresses. Other terms used in the past that should now be avoided are hysterical seizures, functional seizures, stress seizures, and others.  Distinguishing PNES from epileptic seizures may be difficult at the bedside, even for experienced clinicians. Indeed, some researchers have characterized PNES as occupying a no-man's land at the intersection between Neurology and Psychiatry. Diagnostic delay of years with PNES is common. Video electroencephalography (video-EEG) of a typical event showing the absence of epileptiform activity during the spell in the setting of a compatible history is the gold standard for diagnosis. Between 20% and 40% of patients referred to epilepsy monitoring units for difficult-to-control seizures are ultimately found to have PNES. A recently reported pediatric series examined 15 years of video-EEG monitoring and found that the final diagnosis was PNES in nearly 20% of monitored individuals; eventual discontinuation of antiseizure medication (ASM) on the grounds of initial misdiagnosis was necessary for nearly 25%.  Correct diagnosis is imperative for the successful treatment of PNES. Still, misdiagnosis is common, especially among primary care and emergency physicians, nearly two-thirds of whom reported their belief that video-EEG is not needed for diagnostic confirmation in a recent study. A comprehensive history and examination are vital steps toward a correct diagnosis. Consultation with neurology is nearly always beneficial; admission to an epilepsy monitoring unit for video-EEG analysis is almost always required. Referral to a comprehensive epilepsy center may be helpful in challenging cases.  The diagnosis of PNES needs to be conveyed to the patient effectively and empathically; doing otherwise carries a non-trivial risk of prompting confusion, anger, or resentment, any or all of which can then exacerbate PNES symptomatology. Diagnostic disclosure is particularly delicate if a given patient was previously diagnosed with epilepsy, and patients with a history of trauma or abuse can easily be re-traumatized by a clumsily rendered diagnosis. Above all, the clinician must acknowledge and underscore that help is available for the patient's symptoms, that these symptoms are real, and that symptoms represent a source of distress to the patient, family, and friends.  Treatment of PNES may be complex, but it is clear that ASMs are of no benefit, and they may cause harm.ASMs should be discontinued unless they are in use to manage concomitant epilepsy, chronic pain, or mood disorders; continuation of ASMs after the PNES diagnosis has been made is associated with poor outcomes. Psychotherapy is effective and can improve seizure frequency, overall psychosocial functioning, and health-related quality of life. 

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate changes in performance-based physical functioning and investigate psychological predictors of physical functioning over time in pediatric patients with chronic pain who completed an interdisciplinary rehabilitation intensive outpatient program (IOP). METHODS: Participants (N = 55; mean age = 14.92 years; 12.7% male, 87.3% female; 83.6% White, 5.6% African-American/Black; 9.1% Latinx) completed baseline measures assessing pain intensity and modifiable psychological factors (i.e., pain catastrophizing, kinesiophobia, anxiety and depressive symptoms). Participants were administered performance-based assessments of physical functioning (i.e., physical endurance, high-level motor abilities) before and after IOP completion. RESULTS: Pain intensity was not significantly associated with physical functioning at either timepoint. There was significant improvement on measures of physical functioning after completion of the IOP when controlling for the effects of sex, race, and ethnicity. Depressive symptoms were associated with baseline physical endurance, β = - .28, p = .047, while pain catastrophizing was associated with baseline gross motor abilities, β = - .28, p = .032. CONCLUSION: Participation in an IOP led to significant improvement in physical endurance and high-level motor ability. Depressive symptoms and pain catastrophizing were associated with physical functioning at baseline but not post-program completion. Integration of pain psychology and physical therapy in an IOP can help address the interrelated psychological and physical factors impacting physical functioning to improve outcomes for children with chronic pain.

Recent literature, public policy, and funding opportunities call attention to the need for better increased integration of health and mental health care services in primary care settings so as to best meet the needs of children and families. There are many benefits to such integration, but pediatric primary care providers (PCPs) face multiple barriers to identifying and managing patients with mental health difficulties. One way to address this problem is through the integration of psychologists into primary care settings who can collaborate with PCPs to provide integrated behavioral health care to youth and families. However, there are challenges to collaboration, which include differences in training, professional cultures, and expectations held by professionals from various disciplines. Effective communication is a key component in supporting interprofessional collaboration between primary care providers and psychologists working in primary care settings. This paper reviews aspects of pediatric medicine culture, critical components of communication, and strategies to improve communication. Three case examples are presented in which some of these challenges have been successfully addressed. Implications and future directions are discussed.