Literature Collection

Healthcare systems in Canada are under pressure and require change-the status quo is no longer fit for purpose, if it ever was. Innovation is often held up as a cure for what ails us, but shiny new things or novel technologies alone have not been enough. This article will explore the concepts of differentiation and integration as being important drivers in the evolution of living organisms, ecosystems, and complex human organizations. The implications of this deep pattern of systems change are essential to understanding the roles of specialization in medicine, and optionality in primary care. Specifically, overspecialization without attention to the principles of healthcare integration can lead to fragmentation of care and worse patient outcomes. Finally, this article will describe some practical examples of system integration as innovation in the form of better public health and care delivery connections, health homes, and community care coordination centres.

OBJECTIVES: With the increasing rates of opioid overdose deaths in the United States, barriers to treatment access for patients seeking medications for opioid use disorder (OUD), and challenges of initiating buprenorphine in patients who use fentanyl, it is essential to explore novel approaches to expanding access to methadone treatment. An opioid treatment program (OTP) and a federally qualified health center (FQHC) partnered to develop and implement an innovative integrated methadone and primary care treatment model. The process for integrating an OTP and FQHC to provide methadone treatment in the primary care setting will be discussed. METHODS: An OTP methadone dispensing site was co-located in the FQHC, utilizing a staffing matrix built on the expertise of each stakeholder. The OTP managed DEA and state regulatory processes, whereas the FQHC physicians provided medical treatment, including methadone treatment protocols, treatment plans, and primary care. Patient demographics, medical history, and retention data for those who entered the program between January 2021 and February 2023 were collected through chart review and analyzed with descriptive statistics. RESULTS: A total of 288 OTP-FHQC patients were enrolled during the study. Retention rates in methadone treatment at 90 and 180 days were similar to partner clinics. CONCLUSIONS: Collaboration between FQHCs and OTPs is operationally feasible and can be achieved utilizing the current staffing model of the FQHC and OTP. This model can increase access to treatment for OUD and primary care for an urban, underserved patient population.

INTRODUCTION: Women who attend alcohol and other drug (AOD) services experience higher rates of unintended pregnancy, and access less contraception, than the general population. This study aims to observe contraceptive initiation and use after contraception services were offered at metropolitan and regional AOD services. METHODS: Clinical staff were provided contraception education. One hundred women aged 16-49 were recruited from two services between 2017 and 2021. Women completed a questionnaire on their obstetrics and gynaecological history, pregnancy plans and contraception use. Women were provided education on contraception options and offered referral to a contraception pathway. The primary outcome was initiation of highly reliable contraception; secondary outcomes were the types of contraception initiated, and contraception use and pregnancy at 12 months. We compared the initiation of contraception across the two study sites. RESULTS: At baseline, 91% of women were not planning a pregnancy within 12 months, with 21% of these using highly reliable contraception. Of all women not planning a pregnancy, 28% initiated highly reliable contraception via the pathway (2% metropolitan, 51% regional, p < 0.001), with intrauterine devices being the most frequent method initiated (15%). At 12 months, 44% were using highly reliable contraception and 15% had recorded pregnancies. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Contraception pathways for women in AOD treatment can improve initiation of highly reliable methods of contraception, although pregnancy rates were still high and there were large differences between the study sites. Care navigation and clinical champions are some potential facilitators to contraception access, and understanding additional barriers to access may be useful.