Literature Collection

Collection Insights

10K+

References

9K+

Articles

1400+

Grey Literature

4500+

Opioids & SU

The Literature Collection contains over 10,000 references for published and grey literature on the integration of behavioral health and primary care. Learn More

Use the Search feature below to find references for your terms across the entire Literature Collection, or limit your searches by Authors, Keywords, or Titles and by Year, Type, or Topic. View your search results as displayed, or use the options to: Show more references per page; Sort references by Title or Date; and Refine your search criteria. Expand an individual reference to View Details. Full-text access to the literature may be available through a link to PubMed, a DOI, or a URL. References may also be exported for use in bibliographic software (e.g., EndNote, RefWorks, Zotero).

Year
Sort by
Order
Show
598 Results
181
Effect of an intensive outpatient program to augment primary care for high-need veterans affairs patients a randomized clinical trial
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Donna M. Zulman, Christine Pal Chee, Stephen C. Ezeji-Okoye, Jonathan G. Shaw, Tyson H. Holmes, James S. Kahn, Steven M. Asch
Year: 2017
Topic(s):
Financing & Sustainability See topic collection
,
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
,
Medical Home See topic collection
182
Effect of facilitation on practice outcomes in the National Demonstration Project model of the patient-centered medical home
Type: Journal Article
Authors: P. A. Nutting, B. F. Crabtree, E. E. Stewart, W. L. Miller, R. F. Palmer, K. C. Stange, C. R. Jaen
Year: 2010
Publication Place: United States
Abstract: PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to elucidate the effect of facilitation on practice outcomes in the 2-year patient-centered medical home (PCMH) National Demonstration Project (NDP) intervention, and to describe practices' experience in implementing different components of the NDP model of the PCMH. METHODS: Thirty-six family practices were randomized to a facilitated intervention group or a self-directed intervention group. We measured 3 practice-level outcomes: (1) the proportion of 39 components of the NDP model that practices implemented, (2) the aggregate patient rating of the practices' PCMH attributes, and (3) the practices' ability to make and sustain change, which we term adaptive reserve. We used a repeated-measures analysis of variance to test the intervention effects. RESULTS: By the end of the 2 years of the NDP, practices in both facilitated and self-directed groups had at least 70% of the NDP model components in place. Implementation was relatively harder if the model component affected multiple roles and processes, required coordination across work units, necessitated additional resources and expertise, or challenged the traditional model of primary care. Electronic visits, group visits, team-based care, wellness promotion, and proactive population management presented the greatest challenges. Controlling for baseline differences and practice size, facilitated practices had greater increases in adaptive reserve (group difference by time, P = .005) and the proportion of NDP model components implemented (group difference by time, P=.02); the latter increased from 42% to 72% in the facilitated group and from 54% to 70% in the self-directed group. Patient ratings of the practices' PCMH attributes did not differ between groups and, in fact, diminished in both of them. CONCLUSIONS: Highly motivated practices can implement many components of the PCMH in 2 years, but apparently at a cost of diminishing the patient's experience of care. Intense facilitation increases the number of components implemented and improves practices' adaptive reserve. Longer follow-up is needed to assess the sustained and evolving effects of moving independent practices toward PCMHs.
Topic(s):
Medical Home See topic collection
183
Effect of the Patient-Centered Medical Home on Racial Disparities in Quality of Care
Type: Journal Article
Authors: K. E. Swietek, B. N. Gaynes, G. L. Jackson, M. Weinberger, M. E. Domino
Year: 2020
Publication Place: United States
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Research demonstrates that the patient-centered medical home (PCMH) is associated with improved clinical outcomes and quality of care, and the populations that can most benefit from this model require long-term management, e.g., persons with chronic illness and behavioral health conditions. However, different populations may not benefit equally from the PCMH, and empirical evidence about the effects of this model on racial disparities is limited. OBJECTIVE: Estimate the association between enrollment in National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA)-recognized PCMHs and racial disparities in quality of care for adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) and comorbid medical conditions. DESIGN: Applying a quasi-experimental instrumental variable design to account for differential selection into the PCMH, we used generalized estimating equations to determine the probability of receiving eight disease-specific quality measures. SUBJECTS: Medicaid enrollees in three states not dually enrolled in Medicare, ages 18-64 with MDD and > 1 other chronic condition. A subgroup analysis was conducted for enrollees with comorbid diabetes. INTERVENTIONS: Enrollment in an NCQA-recognized PCMH. MAIN MEASURES: Disease-specific quality indicators for MDD (e.g., antidepressant use, receipt of psychotherapy), and for diabetes, (e.g. A1c testing, LDL-C testing, retinal exams, and medical attention for nephropathy). KEY RESULTS: PCMH enrollment was associated with an increase in the overall likelihood of receiving six of eight recommended services and a decrease in the likelihood of receiving any psychotherapy (4.94 percentage points, p < 0.01) and retinal exams (5.51 percentage points, p < 0.05). Although both groups improved, PCMH enrollment was associated with an exacerbation of the Black-white disparity in adequate antidepressant use by 4.20 percentage points (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: While PCMH enrollment may improve the overall quality of care, the effect is inconsistent across racial groups and not always associated with reductions in racial disparities in quality.
Topic(s):
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
,
Medical Home See topic collection
184
Effect of the Patient-Centered Medical Home on Racial Disparities in Quality of Care
Type: Journal Article
Authors: K. E. Swietek, B. N. Gaynes, G. L. Jackson, M. Weinberger, M. E. Domino
Year: 2020
Publication Place: United States
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Research demonstrates that the patient-centered medical home (PCMH) is associated with improved clinical outcomes and quality of care, and the populations that can most benefit from this model require long-term management, e.g., persons with chronic illness and behavioral health conditions. However, different populations may not benefit equally from the PCMH, and empirical evidence about the effects of this model on racial disparities is limited. OBJECTIVE: Estimate the association between enrollment in National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA)-recognized PCMHs and racial disparities in quality of care for adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) and comorbid medical conditions. DESIGN: Applying a quasi-experimental instrumental variable design to account for differential selection into the PCMH, we used generalized estimating equations to determine the probability of receiving eight disease-specific quality measures. SUBJECTS: Medicaid enrollees in three states not dually enrolled in Medicare, ages 18-64 with MDD and > 1 other chronic condition. A subgroup analysis was conducted for enrollees with comorbid diabetes. INTERVENTIONS: Enrollment in an NCQA-recognized PCMH. MAIN MEASURES: Disease-specific quality indicators for MDD (e.g., antidepressant use, receipt of psychotherapy), and for diabetes, (e.g. A1c testing, LDL-C testing, retinal exams, and medical attention for nephropathy). KEY RESULTS: PCMH enrollment was associated with an increase in the overall likelihood of receiving six of eight recommended services and a decrease in the likelihood of receiving any psychotherapy (4.94 percentage points, p < 0.01) and retinal exams (5.51 percentage points, p < 0.05). Although both groups improved, PCMH enrollment was associated with an exacerbation of the Black-white disparity in adequate antidepressant use by 4.20 percentage points (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: While PCMH enrollment may improve the overall quality of care, the effect is inconsistent across racial groups and not always associated with reductions in racial disparities in quality.
Topic(s):
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
,
Medical Home See topic collection
186
Effective team-based primary care: observations from innovative practices
Type: Journal Article
Authors: E. H. Wagner, M. Flinter, C. Hsu, D. Cromp, B. T. Austin, R. Etz, B. F. Crabtree, M. D. Ladden
Year: 2017
Publication Place: England
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Team-based care is now recognized as an essential feature of high quality primary care, but there is limited empiric evidence to guide practice transformation. The purpose of this paper is to describe advances in the configuration and deployment of practice teams based on in-depth study of 30 primary care practices viewed as innovators in team-based care. METHODS: As part of LEAP, a national program of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, primary care experts nominated 227 innovative primary care practices. We selected 30 practices for intensive study through review of practice descriptive and performance data. Each practice hosted a 3-day site visit between August, 2012 and September, 2013, where specific advances in team configuration and roles were noted. Advances were identified by site visitors and confirmed at a meeting involving representatives from each of the 30 practices. RESULTS: LEAP practices have expanded the roles of existing staff and added new personnel to provide the person power and skills needed to perform the tasks and functions expected of a patient-centered medical home (PCMH). LEAP practice teams generally include a rich array of staff, especially registered nurses (RNs), behavioral health specialists, and lay health workers. Most LEAP practices organize their staff into core teams, which are built around partnerships between providers and specific Medical Assistants (MAs), and often include registered nurses (RNs) and others such as health coaches or receptionists. MAs, RNs, and other staff are heavily involved in the planning and delivery of preventive and chronic illness care. The care of more complex patients is supported by behavioral health specialists, RN care managers, and pharmacists. Standing orders and protocols enable staff to act independently. CONCLUSIONS: The 30 LEAP practices engage health professional and lay staff in patient care to the maximum extent, which enables the practices to meet the expectations of a PCMH and helps free up providers to focus on tasks that only they can perform.
Topic(s):
Education & Workforce See topic collection
,
Medical Home See topic collection
187
Effectiveness of collaborative care for depression in human immunodeficiency virus clinics
Type: Journal Article
Authors: J. M. Pyne, J. C. Fortney, G. M. Curran, S. Tripathi, J. H. Atkinson, A. M. Kilbourne, H. J. Hagedorn, D. Rimland, M. C. Rodriguez-Barradas, T. Monson, K. A. Bottonari, S. M. Asch, A. L. Gifford
Year: 2011
Publication Place: United States
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Depression is common among persons with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and is associated with unfavorable outcomes. METHODS: A single-blind randomized controlled effectiveness trial at 3 Veterans Affairs HIV clinics (HIV Translating Initiatives for Depression Into Effective Solutions [HITIDES]). The HITIDES intervention consisted of an off-site HIV depression care team (a registered nurse depression care manager, pharmacist, and psychiatrist) that delivered up to 12 months of collaborative care backed by a Web-based decision support system. Participants who completed the baseline telephone interview were 249 HIV-infected patients with depression, of whom 123 were randomized to the intervention and 126 to usual care. Participant interview data were collected at baseline and at the 6- and 12-month follow-up visits. The primary outcome was depression severity measured using the 20-item Hopkins Symptom Checklist (SCL-20) and reported as treatment response (>/=50% decrease in SCL-20 item score), remission (mean SCL-20 item score, <0.5), and depression-free days. Secondary outcomes were health-related quality of life, health status, HIV symptom severity, and antidepressant or HIV medication regimen adherence. RESULTS: Intervention participants were more likely to report treatment response (33.3% vs 17.5%) (odds ratio, 2.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.37-4.56) and remission (22.0% vs 11.9%) (2.25; 1.11-4.54) at 6 months but not 12 months. Intervention participants reported more depression-free days during the 12 months (beta = 19.3; 95% CI, 10.9-27.6; P < .001). Significant intervention effects were observed for lowering HIV symptom severity at 6 months (beta = -2.6; 95% CI, -3.5 to -1.8; P < .001) and 12 months (beta = -0.82; -1.6 to -0.07; P = .03). Intervention effects were not significant for other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: The HITIDES intervention improved depression and HIV symptom outcomes and may serve as a model for collaborative care interventions in HIV and other specialty physical health care settings where patients find their "medical home." TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00304915.
Topic(s):
Medical Home See topic collection
,
HIT & Telehealth See topic collection
188
Effects of Intensive Primary Care on High-Need Patient Experiences: Survey Findings from a Veterans Affairs Randomized Quality Improvement Trial
Type: Journal Article
Authors: D. M. Zulman, E. T. Chang, A. Wong, J. Yoon, S. E. Stockdale, M. K. Ong, L. V. Rubenstein, S. M. Asch
Year: 2019
Publication Place: United States
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Intensive primary care programs aim to coordinate care for patients with medical, behavioral, and social complexity, but little is known about their impact on patient experience when implemented in a medical home. OBJECTIVE: Determine how augmenting the VA's medical home (Patient Aligned Care Team, PACT) with a PACT-Intensive Management (PIM) program influences patient experiences with care coordination, access, provider relationships, and satisfaction. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of patient survey data from a five-site randomized quality improvement study. PARTICIPANTS: Two thousand five hundred sixty-six Veterans with hospitalization risk scores >/= 90th percentile and recent acute care. INTERVENTION: PIM offered patients intensive care coordination, including home visits, accompaniment to specialists, acute care follow-up, and case management from a team staffed by primary care providers, social workers, psychologists, nurses, and/or other support staff. MAIN MEASURES: Patient-reported experiences with care coordination (e.g., health goal assessment, test and appointment follow-up, Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC)), access to healthcare services, provider relationships, and satisfaction. KEY RESULTS: Seven hundred fifty-nine PIM and 768 PACT patients responded to the survey (response rate 60%). Patients randomized to PIM were more likely than those in PACT to report that they were asked about their health goals (AOR = 1.26; P = 0.046) and that they have a VA provider whom they trust (AOR = 1.35; P = 0.005). PIM patients also had higher mean (SD) PACIC scores compared with PACT patients (2.91 (1.31) vs. 2.75 (1.25), respectively; P = 0.022) and were more likely to report 10 out of 10 on satisfaction with primary care (AOR = 1.25; P = 0.048). However, other effects on coordination, access, and satisfaction did not achieve statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Augmenting VA's patient-centered medical home with intensive primary care had a modestly positive influence on high-risk patients' experiences with care coordination and provider relationships, but did not have a significant impact on most patient-reported access and satisfaction measures.
Topic(s):
Medical Home See topic collection
189
Effects of Intensive Primary Care on High-Need Patient Experiences: Survey Findings from a Veterans Affairs Randomized Quality Improvement Trial
Type: Journal Article
Authors: D. M. Zulman, E. T. Chang, A. Wong, J. Yoon, S. E. Stockdale, M. K. Ong, L. V. Rubenstein, S. M. Asch
Year: 2019
Publication Place: United States
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Intensive primary care programs aim to coordinate care for patients with medical, behavioral, and social complexity, but little is known about their impact on patient experience when implemented in a medical home. OBJECTIVE: Determine how augmenting the VA's medical home (Patient Aligned Care Team, PACT) with a PACT-Intensive Management (PIM) program influences patient experiences with care coordination, access, provider relationships, and satisfaction. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of patient survey data from a five-site randomized quality improvement study. PARTICIPANTS: Two thousand five hundred sixty-six Veterans with hospitalization risk scores >/= 90th percentile and recent acute care. INTERVENTION: PIM offered patients intensive care coordination, including home visits, accompaniment to specialists, acute care follow-up, and case management from a team staffed by primary care providers, social workers, psychologists, nurses, and/or other support staff. MAIN MEASURES: Patient-reported experiences with care coordination (e.g., health goal assessment, test and appointment follow-up, Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC)), access to healthcare services, provider relationships, and satisfaction. KEY RESULTS: Seven hundred fifty-nine PIM and 768 PACT patients responded to the survey (response rate 60%). Patients randomized to PIM were more likely than those in PACT to report that they were asked about their health goals (AOR = 1.26; P = 0.046) and that they have a VA provider whom they trust (AOR = 1.35; P = 0.005). PIM patients also had higher mean (SD) PACIC scores compared with PACT patients (2.91 (1.31) vs. 2.75 (1.25), respectively; P = 0.022) and were more likely to report 10 out of 10 on satisfaction with primary care (AOR = 1.25; P = 0.048). However, other effects on coordination, access, and satisfaction did not achieve statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Augmenting VA's patient-centered medical home with intensive primary care had a modestly positive influence on high-risk patients' experiences with care coordination and provider relationships, but did not have a significant impact on most patient-reported access and satisfaction measures.
Topic(s):
Medical Home See topic collection
190
Effects of Patient-Centered Medical Home Attributes on Patients' Perceptions of Quality in Federally Supported Health Centers [Original Research]
Type: Journal Article
Authors: L. A. Lebrun-Harris, L. Shi, J. Zhu, M. T. Burke, A. Sripipatana, Q. Ngo-Metzger
Year: 2013
Topic(s):
Medical Home See topic collection
191
Emerging issues: Psychology's place in the primary care pediatric medical home.
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Douglas Tynan, Kathryn E. Woods
Year: 2013
Topic(s):
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
,
Medical Home See topic collection
192
Emotional Exhaustion in Primary Care During Early Implementation of the VA's Medical Home Transformation: Patient-aligned Care Team (PACT)
Type: Journal Article
Authors: L. S. Meredith, Schmidt Hackbarth, J. Darling, H. P. Rodriguez, S. E. Stockdale, K. M. Cordasco, E. M. Yano, L. V. Rubenstein
Year: 2015
Publication Place: United States
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Transformation of primary care to new patient-centered models requires major changes in healthcare organizations, including interprofessional expectations and organizational policies. Emotional exhaustion (EE) among workers can accompany major organizational change, threatening its success. Yet little guidance exists about the magnitude of associations with EE during primary care transformation. We assessed EE during the initial phase of national primary care transformation in the Veterans Health Administration. RESEARCH DESIGN: Cross-sectional online surveys of primary care clinicians (PCCs) and staff in 23 primary care clinics within 5 healthcare systems in 1 veterans administration administrative region. We used descriptive, bivariate, and multivariable analyses adjusted for clinic membership and weighted for nonresponse. PARTICIPANTS: 515 veterans administration employees (191 PCCs and 324 other primary care staff). MEASURES: Outcome is the EE subscale of the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Predictors include clinic characteristics (from administrative data) and self-reported efficacy for change, experiences with transformation, and perspectives about the organization. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 64% (515/811). In total, 53% of PCCs and 43% of staff had high EE. PCCs (vs. other primary care staff), female (vs. male), and non-Latino (vs. Latino) respondents reported higher EE. Respondents reporting higher efficacy for change and participatory decision making had lower EE scores, adjusting for sex and race. CONCLUSIONS: Recognition by healthcare organizations of the potential for clinician and staff EE during primary care transformation is critical. Methods for reducing EE by increasing clinician and staff change efficacy and opportunities to participate in decision making should be considered, with attention to PCCs, and women.
Topic(s):
Education & Workforce See topic collection
,
Medical Home See topic collection
193
Enabling the patient-centered medical home: The role of information technology
Type: Journal Article
Authors: V. T. Tice
Year: 2010
Publication Place: United States
Topic(s):
HIT & Telehealth See topic collection
,
Healthcare Policy See topic collection
,
Medical Home See topic collection
194
Engaging multilevel stakeholders in an implementation trial of evidence-based quality improvement in VA women's health primary care
Type: Journal Article
Authors: A. B. Hamilton, J. Brunner, C. Cain, E. Chuang, T. M. Luger, I. Canelo, L. Rubenstein, E. M. Yano
Year: 2017
Publication Place: United States
Abstract: The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) has undertaken primary care transformation based on patient-centered medical home (PCMH) tenets. VHA PCMH models are designed for the predominantly male Veteran population, and require tailoring to meet women Veterans' needs. We used evidence-based quality improvement (EBQI), a stakeholder-driven implementation strategy, in a cluster randomized controlled trial across 12 sites (eight EBQI, four control) that are members of a Practice-Based Research Network. EBQI involves engaging multilevel, inter-professional leaders and staff as stakeholders in reviewing evidence and setting QI priorities. The goal of this analysis was to examine processes of engaging stakeholders in early implementation of EBQI to tailor VHA's medical home for women. Four inter-professional regional stakeholder planning meetings were conducted; these meetings engaged stakeholders by providing regional data about gender disparities in Veterans' care experiences. Subsequent to each meeting, qualitative interviews were conducted with 87 key stakeholders (leaders and staff). Stakeholders were asked to describe QI efforts and the use of data to change aspects of care, including women's health care. Interview transcripts were summarized and coded using a hybrid deductive/inductive analytic approach. The presentation of regional-level data about gender disparities resulted in heightened awareness and stakeholder buy-in and decision-making related to women's health-focused QI. Interviews revealed that stakeholders were familiar with QI, with regional and facility leaders aware of inter-disciplinary committees and efforts to foster organizational change, including PCMH transformation. These efforts did not typically focus on women's health, though some informal efforts had been undertaken. Barriers to engaging in QI included lack of communication across clinical service lines, fluidity in staffing, and lack of protected time. Inter-professional, multilevel stakeholders need to be engaged in implementation early, with data and discussion that convey the importance and relevance of a new initiative. Stakeholder perspectives on institutional norms (e.g., gender norms) and readiness for population-specific QI are useful drivers of clinical initiatives designed to transform care for clinical subpopulations.
Topic(s):
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
,
Medical Home See topic collection
195
Enhancing Early Childhood Mental Health Primary Care Services: Evaluation of MA Project LAUNCH
Type: Journal Article
Authors: B. E. Molnar, K. E. Lees, K. Roper, N. Byars, L. Mendez-Penate, C. Moulin, W. McMullen, J. Wolfe, D. Allen
Year: 2018
Publication Place: United States
Topic(s):
Measures See topic collection
,
Medical Home See topic collection
196
Enhancing patient-centered care: pilot study results of a community care team intervention
Type: Journal Article
Authors: C. E. Vanderboom, D. E. Holland, C. M. Lohse, P. V. Targonski, E. A. Madigan
Year: 2014
Publication Place: United States
Abstract: Health care reform focuses on primary care and development of Health Care Homes to improve patient-centered chronic illness care. This pilot study evaluated a community care team intervention that linked chronically ill older patients, support persons, and nurse care coordinators from a Health Care Home with community resources using an adaptation of the Wraparound process. A pragmatic clinical trial design was used. Patient-centered chronic illness care; physical, mental, and social health; service use; and study feasibility were evaluated. Differences between groups were compared using two-sample t, Wilcoxon rank sum, chi-square, or Fisher's exact tests. At 3 months, the intervention group reported higher patient-centered chronic illness care (mean total Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care change scores were 0.39 for the intervention group and -0.11 for the control group, p = .03). Results indicate that the integrated community care team intervention is a promising strategy to support patient-centered chronic illness care.
Topic(s):
Medical Home See topic collection
,
Education & Workforce See topic collection
,
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
197
Essential competencies for psychologists in patient centered medical homes.
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Justin M. Nash, Parinda Khatri, Barbara A. Cubic, Macaran A. Baird
Year: 2013
Topic(s):
Education & Workforce See topic collection
,
Medical Home See topic collection
198
Ethical and effectiveness considerations with primary care behavioral health research in the medical home.
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Jeffrey L. Goodie, Kathryn E. Kanzler, Christopher L. Hunter, Michael Ann Glotfelter, Jennifer J. Bodart
Year: 2013
Topic(s):
Medical Home See topic collection
199
Evaluating the psychometric properties of the CAHPS Patient-centered Medical Home survey
Type: Journal Article
Authors: R. D. Hays, L. J. Berman, M. H. Kanter, M. Hugh, R. R. Oglesby, C . Y. Kim, M. Cui, J. Brown
Year: 2014
Publication Place: United States
Topic(s):
Medical Home See topic collection
200
Evaluation of patient centered medical home practice transformation initiatives
Type: Journal Article
Authors: B. F. Crabtree, S. M. Chase, C. G. Wise, G. D. Schiff, L. A. Schmidt, J. R. Goyzueta, R. A. Malouin, S. M. Payne, M. T. Quinn, P. A. Nutting, W. L. Miller, C. R. Jaen
Year: 2011
Publication Place: United States
Abstract: BACKGROUND: The patient-centered medical home (PCMH) has become a widely cited solution to the deficiencies in primary care delivery in the United States. To achieve the magnitude of change being called for in primary care, quality improvement interventions must focus on whole-system redesign, and not just isolated parts of medical practices. METHODS: Investigators participating in 9 different evaluations of Patient Centered Medical Home implementation shared experiences, methodological strategies, and evaluation challenges for evaluating primary care practice redesign. RESULTS: A year-long iterative process of sharing and reflecting on experiences produced consensus on 7 recommendations for future PCMH evaluations: (1) look critically at models being implemented and identify aspects requiring modification; (2) include embedded qualitative and quantitative data collection to detail the implementation process; (3) capture details concerning how different PCMH components interact with one another over time; (4) understand and describe how and why physician and staff roles do, or do not evolve; (5) identify the effectiveness of individual PCMH components and how they are used; (6) capture how primary care practices interface with other entities such as specialists, hospitals, and referral services; and (7) measure resources required for initiating and sustaining innovations. CONCLUSIONS: Broad-based longitudinal, mixed-methods designs that provide for shared learning among practice participants, program implementers, and evaluators are necessary to evaluate the novelty and promise of the PCMH model. All PCMH evaluations should as comprehensive as possible, and at a minimum should include a combination of brief observations and targeted qualitative interviews along with quantitative measures.
Topic(s):
Medical Home See topic collection