Email UpdatesLiterature Collection
Collection Insights
10K+
References
9K+
Articles
1400+
Grey Literature
4500+
Opioids & SU
The Literature Collection contains over 10,000 references for published and grey literature on the integration of behavioral health and primary care. Learn More
Use the Search feature below to find references for your terms across the entire Literature Collection, or limit your searches by Authors, Keywords, or Titles and by Year, Type, or Topic. View your search results as displayed, or use the options to: Show more references per page; Sort references by Title or Date; and Refine your search criteria. Expand an individual reference to View Details. Full-text access to the literature may be available through a link to PubMed, a DOI, or a URL. References may also be exported for use in bibliographic software (e.g., EndNote, RefWorks, Zotero).
1286 Results
264
Consultation psychiatry in the medical home and accountable care organizations: Achieving the triple aim
Type: Journal Article
Year: 2011
Publication Place: United States
Topic(s):
Financing & Sustainability
See topic collection
, Medical Home
See topic collection
Reference Links: 
View the DOI record for Consultation psychiatry in the medical home and accountable care organizations: Achieving the triple aim
View DOI Record
View the PubMed citation for Consultation psychiatry in the medical home and accountable care organizations: Achieving the triple aim265
Consumers' Valuation of Primary Care-Based Treatment Options for Mental and Substance Use Disorders
Type: Journal Article
Year: 2015
Publication Place: United States
Abstract: Most individuals with substance use disorders and with mental disorders do not receive treatment. If treatment options were more attractive, treatment rates might increase. The advantages of novel approaches, including primary care-based treatment and collaborative care in a primary care setting, have been documented. However, less is known about consumers' valuation of these options. The authors assessed monetary valuation of these treatment types compared with usual care in a specialty treatment setting. Contingent valuation methods were used in a Web-based randomized vignette experiment that involved 2,146 individuals who screened positive for a drug or alcohol use disorder or a mental disorder. Participants valued a primary care-based treatment visit over usual care in a specialty treatment setting by $9.00 and a collaborative care visit over usual care in a specialty treatment setting by $5.85.
Topic(s):
Financing & Sustainability
See topic collection
Reference Links:
View the DOI record for Consumers' Valuation of Primary Care-Based Treatment Options for Mental and Substance Use Disorders
View DOI Record
View the PubMed citation for Consumers' Valuation of Primary Care-Based Treatment Options for Mental and Substance Use Disorders266
Continuity of care and health care costs among persons with severe mental illness
Type: Journal Article
Year: 2005
Publication Place: United States
Abstract: OBJECTIVES: Although the association between continuity of care and health outcomes among persons with severe mental illness is beginning to be elucidated, the association between continuity and costs has remained virtually unexplored. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship of continuity of care and health care costs in a sample of 437 adults with severe mental illness in three health regions of Alberta, Canada. METHODS: Service use events and costs were tracked through self-reported and administrative data. Associations between continuity and costs were examined by using analysis of variance and regression analysis. RESULTS: Mean+/-SD total, hospital, and community cost over the 17-month study period were $24,070+/-$25,643, $12,505+/-$20,991, and $2,848+/-$4,420, respectively. The difference in means across levels of observer-rated continuity was not statistically significant for total cost, but improved continuity was associated with both lower hospital cost and higher community cost. Total cost was significantly lower for patients with a higher self-rated quality of life as indicated on the EQ-5D visual analogue scale, although associations did not hold up in the regression analysis. Patients with higher functioning as rated by the Multnomah Community Abilities Scale had significantly lower total and community costs. CONCLUSIONS: The study showed a relationship between continuity of care and both hospital and community costs. The data also indicate that a relationship exists between cost and level of patient functioning. It will be necessary to conduct further studies using experimental designs to examine the impact of shifting resources from hospitals to the community, particularly for high-need patients, on continuity of care and subsequent outcomes.
Topic(s):
Financing & Sustainability
See topic collection
Reference Links:
View the DOI record for Continuity of care and health care costs among persons with severe mental illness
View DOI Record
View the PubMed citation for Continuity of care and health care costs among persons with severe mental illness268
Controlled trial of a collaborative primary care team model for patients with diabetes and depression: rationale and design for a comprehensive evaluation
Type: Journal Article
Year: 2012
Publication Place: England
Abstract: BACKGROUND: When depression accompanies diabetes, it complicates treatment, portends worse outcomes and increases health care costs. A collaborative care case-management model, previously tested in an urban managed care organization in the US, achieved significant reduction of depressive symptoms, improved diabetes disease control and patient-reported outcomes, and saved money. While impressive, these findings need to be replicated and extended to other healthcare settings. Our objective is to comprehensively evaluate a collaborative care model for comorbid depression and type 2 diabetes within a Canadian primary care setting. METHODS/DESIGN: We initiated the TeamCare model in four Primary Care Networks in Northern Alberta. The intervention involves a nurse care manager guiding patient-centered care with family physicians and consultant physician specialists to monitor progress and develop tailored care plans. Patients eligible for the intervention will be identified using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 as a screen for depressive symptoms. Care managers will then guide patients through three phases: 1) improving depressive symptoms, 2) improving blood glucose, blood pressure and cholesterol, and 3) improving lifestyle behaviors. We will employ the RE-AIM framework for a comprehensive and mixed-methods approach to our evaluation. Effectiveness will be assessed using a controlled "on-off" trial design, whereby eligible patients would be alternately enrolled in the TeamCare intervention or usual care on a monthly basis. All patients will be assessed at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Our primary analyses will be based on changes in two outcomes: depressive symptoms, and a multivariable, scaled marginal model for the combined outcome of global disease control (i.e., A1c, systolic blood pressure, LDL cholesterol). Our planned enrolment of 168 patients will provide greater than 80% power to observe clinically important improvements in all measured outcomes. Direct costing of all intervention components and measurement of all health care utilization using linked administrative databases will be used to determine the cost-effectiveness of the intervention relative to usual care. DISCUSSION: Our comprehensive evaluation will generate evidence to reliability, effectiveness and sustainability of this collaborative care model for patients with chronic diseases and depression. TRIALS REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01328639.
Topic(s):
Financing & Sustainability
See topic collection
272
Cost and quality impact of Intermountain's mental health integration program
Type: Journal Article
Year: 2010
Publication Place: United States
Abstract: Most patients with mental health (MH) conditions, such as depression, receive care for their conditions from a primary care physician (PCP) in their health/medical home. Providing MH care, however, presents many challenges for the PCP, including (1) the difficulty of getting needed consultation from an MH specialist; (2) the time constraints of a busy PCP practice; (3) the complicated nature of recognizing depression, which may be described with only somatic complaints; (4) the barriers to reimbursement and compensation; and (5) associated medical and social comorbidities. Practice managers, emergency departments, and health plans are stretched to provide care for complex patients with unmet MH needs. At the same time, payment reform linked to accountable care organizations and/or episodic bundle payments, MH parity rules, and increasing MH costs to large employers and payers all highlight the critical need to identify high-quality, efficient, integrated MH care delivery practices. Over the past ten years, Intermountain Healthcare has developed a team-based approach-known as mental health integration (MHI)-for caring for these patients and their families. The team includes the PCPs and their staff, and they, in turn, are integrated with MH professionals, community resources, care management, and the patient and his or her family. The integration model goes far beyond co-location in its team-based approach; it is operationalized at the clinic, thereby improving both physician and staff satisfaction. Patients treated in MHI clinics also show improved satisfaction, lower costs, and better quality outcomes. The MHI program is financially sustainable in routinized clinics without subsidies. MHI is a successful approach to improving care for patients with MH conditions in primary care health homes.
Topic(s):
Education & Workforce
See topic collection
, Financing & Sustainability
See topic collection
, Medically Unexplained Symptoms
See topic collection
, Healthcare Policy
See topic collection
Reference Links: View the PubMed citation for Cost and quality impact of Intermountain's mental health integration program
275
Cost effectiveness of brief interventions for reducing alcohol consumption
Type: Journal Article
Year: 2001
Publication Place: England
Abstract: The direct costs and health effects of a primary-care-based brief intervention for hazardous alcohol consumption were examined. The total cost of the intervention was calculated from costs associated with: marketing the intervention programme; providing training and support in the use of the intervention materials; physician time required for providing brief advice for 'at-risk' drinkers. The effect of the intervention on health outcomes was expressed in terms of number of life years saved by preventing alcohol-related deaths. This was derived by combining estimates of the impact of the programme if it were implemented nationally with available evidence on the health effects of excess alcohol consumption. Results are based on international trial evidence showing the physical resources required by the intervention and its effectiveness combined with Australian price data. The costs associated with screening and brief advice using the current intervention programme range from Aus$19.14 to Aus$21.50. The marginal costs per additional life year saved were below Aus$1873. The robustness of the model used is supported by an extensive sensitivity analysis. In comparison with existing health promotion strategies the costs and effects of the current intervention are highly encouraging.
Topic(s):
Financing & Sustainability
See topic collection
Reference Links: View the PubMed citation for Cost effectiveness of brief interventions for reducing alcohol consumption
276
Cost effectiveness of text messages to reduce methamphetamine use and HIV sexual risk behaviors among men who have sex with men
Type: Journal Article
Year: 2019
Topic(s):
Education & Workforce
See topic collection
, Financing & Sustainability
See topic collection
, Healthcare Disparities
See topic collection
, HIT & Telehealth
See topic collection
, Measures
See topic collection
, Opioids & Substance Use
See topic collection
277
Cost of Practice Transformation in Primary Care: Joining an Accountable Care Organization
Type: Journal Article
Year: 2018
Publication Place: United States
Abstract: The purpose of this study is to examine the costs related to practice transformation from the perspective of primary care organizations transitioning to become participants in Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs). We pose two research questions: 1) Will a Rural Health Clinic that participates in an Accountable Care Organization see higher or lower cost per visit, and 2) If the cost per visit is higher or lower, how large will that difference be? We analyze administrative data from a panel of over 800 Rural Health Clinics for the period 2007 - 2013 using a treatment effects approach, where a clinic's participation in an ACO is viewed as a "treatment." Since the first year that an RHC could join an ACO was 2012 and our most recent year of complete data is 2013, we restricted our analysis of the impact of participation in an ACO to include only 2012 and 2013 data. The estimates of the average treatment effect on the treated (ATET) pertain to only those RHCs that joined ACOs. The results show that those 20 sample ACO RHCs experienced an average from $15.00 to $18.61 higher cost per visit than the matching non-ACO RHCs. At this very early stage of ACO development, our results must be considered very preliminary at best. Whatever conclusions we draw from these results are intended to merely suggest what might be found once many more RHCs join ACOs. The conclusions we draw from this early analysis can lay a foundation for more analysis after data are available when more RHCs join ACOs.
Topic(s):
Financing & Sustainability
See topic collection
, Healthcare Disparities
See topic collection
Reference Links: View the PubMed citation for Cost of Practice Transformation in Primary Care: Joining an Accountable Care Organization
278
Cost of Practice Transformation in Primary Care: Joining an Accountable Care Organization
Type: Journal Article
Year: 2018
Publication Place: United States
Abstract: The purpose of this study is to examine the costs related to practice transformation from the perspective of primary care organizations transitioning to become participants in Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs). We pose two research questions: 1) Will a Rural Health Clinic that participates in an Accountable Care Organization see higher or lower cost per visit, and 2) If the cost per visit is higher or lower, how large will that difference be? We analyze administrative data from a panel of over 800 Rural Health Clinics for the period 2007 - 2013 using a treatment effects approach, where a clinic's participation in an ACO is viewed as a "treatment." Since the first year that an RHC could join an ACO was 2012 and our most recent year of complete data is 2013, we restricted our analysis of the impact of participation in an ACO to include only 2012 and 2013 data. The estimates of the average treatment effect on the treated (ATET) pertain to only those RHCs that joined ACOs. The results show that those 20 sample ACO RHCs experienced an average from $15.00 to $18.61 higher cost per visit than the matching non-ACO RHCs. At this very early stage of ACO development, our results must be considered very preliminary at best. Whatever conclusions we draw from these results are intended to merely suggest what might be found once many more RHCs join ACOs. The conclusions we draw from this early analysis can lay a foundation for more analysis after data are available when more RHCs join ACOs.
Topic(s):
Financing & Sustainability
See topic collection
, Healthcare Disparities
See topic collection
Reference Links: View the PubMed citation for Cost of Practice Transformation in Primary Care: Joining an Accountable Care Organization
280
Cost savings associated with an alternative payment model for integrating behavioral health in primary care
Type: Journal Article
Year: 2018
Abstract: Financially supporting and sustaining behavioral health services integrated into primary care settings remains a major barrier to widespread implementation. Sustaining Healthcare Across Integrated Primary Care Efforts (SHAPE) was a demonstration project designed to prospectively examine the cost savings associated with utilizing an alternative payment methodology to support behavioral health services in primary care practices with integrated behavioral health services. Six primary care practices in Colorado participated in this project. Each practice had at least one on-site behavioral health clinician providing integrated behavioral health services. Three practices received non-fee-for-service payments (i.e., SHAPE payment) to support provision of behavioral health services for 18 months. Three practices did not receive the SHAPE payment and served as control practices for comparison purposes. Assignment to condition was nonrandom. Patient claims data were collected for 9 months before the start of the SHAPE demonstration project (pre-period) and for 18 months during the SHAPE project (post-period) to evaluate cost savings. During the 18-month post-period, analysis of the practices' claims data demonstrated that practices receiving the SHAPE payment generated approximately $1.08 million in net cost savings for their public payer population (i.e., Medicare, Medicaid, and Dual Eligible; N = 9,042). The cost savings were primarily achieved through reduction in downstream utilization (e.g., hospitalizations). The SHAPE demonstration project found that non-fee-for-service payments for behavioral health integrated into primary care may be associated with significant cost savings for public payers, which could have implications on future delivery and payment work in public programs (e.g., Medicaid).
Topic(s):
Financing & Sustainability
See topic collection
Reference Links:
View the DOI record for Cost savings associated with an alternative payment model for integrating behavioral health in primary care
View DOI Record
View the PubMed citation for Cost savings associated with an alternative payment model for integrating behavioral health in primary care