Literature Collection

Collection Insights

10K+

References

9K+

Articles

1400+

Grey Literature

4500+

Opioids & SU

The Literature Collection contains over 10,000 references for published and grey literature on the integration of behavioral health and primary care. Learn More

Use the Search feature below to find references for your terms across the entire Literature Collection, or limit your searches by Authors, Keywords, or Titles and by Year, Type, or Topic. View your search results as displayed, or use the options to: Show more references per page; Sort references by Title or Date; and Refine your search criteria. Expand an individual reference to View Details. Full-text access to the literature may be available through a link to PubMed, a DOI, or a URL. References may also be exported for use in bibliographic software (e.g., EndNote, RefWorks, Zotero).

Year
Sort by
Order
Show
677 Results
241
Enhancing distress tolerance to uplift motivation in recovery: Results from an open development trial
Type: Journal Article
Authors: P. H. Bhuptani, A. Block, Jiménez Muñoz, M. S. Bello, S. Ramsey, M. Ranney, K. Carey, J. Rich, K. Langdon
Year: 2023
Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
,
Measures See topic collection
242
Enhancing Early Childhood Mental Health Primary Care Services: Evaluation of MA Project LAUNCH
Type: Journal Article
Authors: B. E. Molnar, K. E. Lees, K. Roper, N. Byars, L. Mendez-Penate, C. Moulin, W. McMullen, J. Wolfe, D. Allen
Year: 2018
Publication Place: United States
Topic(s):
Measures See topic collection
,
Medical Home See topic collection
243
Enhancing Knowledge and Attitudes Regarding Opioid Use Disorder Among Private Primary Care Clinics: A Quality Improvement Project
Type: Journal Article
Authors: S. K. Jassar, A. Hundley, A. Giesler
Year: 2023
Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
,
Education & Workforce See topic collection
,
Measures See topic collection
244
Establishing a Web-Based Academic Toolbox for Primary Behavioral Care
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Kathleen T. McCoy, Erwin Story, Kathleen Gaffney, Patricia D. Cunningham
Year: 2011
Publication Place: Netherlands
Topic(s):
Education & Workforce See topic collection
,
HIT & Telehealth See topic collection
,
Measures See topic collection
245
Estimation of cutoff for the Severity of Dependence Scale (SDS) for opiate dependence by ROC analysis
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Iraurgi Castillo, Gonzalez Saiz, Lozano Rojas, M. A. Landabaso Vazquez, J. M. Jimenez Lerma
Year: 2010
Publication Place: Spain
Abstract: BACKGROUND: The Severity of Dependence Scale (SDS) is a five-item scale that has been reported to be a reliable and valid screening instrument for dependence in several types of substances. Optimal cutoff points on the SDS indicative of clinically significant dependence have been determined for a large range of substance types, however, to date no data have been reported on its performance in a population with opiate dependence. SAMPLE: A structured interview was administered to 315 opiate-dependent patients in treatment. METHOD: The diagnostic performance of the SDS was measured via Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis according to the DSM-IV diagnosis of heroin dependence, as measured by section 12 of the Schedule for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN). RESULTS: ROC analysis revealed the SDS to be a test of high diagnostic utility for the measurement of opiate dependence (Area Under Curve =0.8875). The cut-off point on the SDS at which there is optimal discrimination between the presence and absence of a diagnosis of heroin dependence was found to be 5 (i.e. a score of 5 or more). This score provides the best trade-off between sensitivity (83.15%) and specificity (84.51%). Similar results were found for heroin current consumption (AUC = 0.8325; cut-off = 5; sensitivity = 77.94 and specificity = 77.33). CONCLUSION: The SDS can be recommended as an effective short instrument for the discrimination of the degree of dependency and heroin consumption in the clinical area.
Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
,
Measures See topic collection
246
Evaluating the complex: Alternative models and measures for evaluating collaboration among substance use services with mental health, primary care and other services and sectors.
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Brian Rush
Year: 2014
Topic(s):
General Literature See topic collection
,
Measures See topic collection
248
Evaluating the effect of Family Integrated Care on maternal stress and anxiety in neonatal intensive care units
Type: Journal Article
Authors: C. Cheng, L. S. Franck, X . Y. Ye, S. A. Hutchinson, S. K. Lee, K. O'Brien
Year: 2021
Abstract:

Objective: To identify how Family Integrated Care (FICare) affected maternal stress and anxiety. Study Design: This secondary analysis of the FICare cluster randomised controlled trial included infants born between 1 April 2013 and 31 August 2015 at ≤33 weeks' gestation. Mothers completed the PSS:NICU and STAI questionnaires at enrolment and study day 21. Results: 1383 mothers completed the surveys at one or both time-points. The mean PSS:NICU and STAI scores at day 21 were significantly lower in the FICare mothers than controls (PSS:NICU mean [standard deviation] FICare 2.32 [0.75], control 2.48 [0.78], p = 0.0005; STAI FICare 70.8 [20.0], control 74.2 [19.6], p = 0.0004). The sights and sounds, looks and behaviour, and parental role PSS:NICU subscales and the state and trait STAI subscales were all significantly different between FIC are and controls at day 21. The magnitude of change in all stress and anxiety subscales was greater in the FICare group than controls. These differences remained significant after adjustment for confounders with the greatest change in the parental role (least-squares mean [95% confidence interval] FICare -0.65 [-0.72, 0.57], control -0.31 [-0.38, -0.24], p < 0.0001) and state anxiety subscales. Conclusion: FICare is effective at reducing NICU-related maternal stress and anxiety.

Topic(s):
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
,
Measures See topic collection
249
Evaluating the effect of family integrated care on maternal stress and anxiety in neonatal intensive care units
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Chelsea Cheng, Linda S. Franck, Xiang Y. Ye, Sarah A. Hutchinson, Shoo K. Lee, Karel O'Brien
Year: 2019
Topic(s):
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
,
Measures See topic collection
250
Evaluating the effectiveness of Take it Personal!+ in people with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning and substance use disorder: A multiple baseline single-case experimental study
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Lotte C. F. Gosens, Evelien A. P. Poelen, Robert Didden, Jannet M. de Jonge, Arnt F. A. Schellekens, Joanneke E. L. VanDerNagel, Patrick Onghena, Roy Otten
Year: 2024
Topic(s):
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
,
HIT & Telehealth See topic collection
,
Measures See topic collection
251
Evaluating the prevalence of child psychosocial concerns in rural primary care
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Matthew Tolliver, Jodi Polaha, Stacey L. Williams, Christina R. Studts
Year: 2020
Topic(s):
Education & Workforce See topic collection
,
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
,
Measures See topic collection
252
Evaluation and comparison of tools for diagnosing problematic prescription opioid use among chronic pain patients
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Merav Kovatch, Daniel Feingold, Odelia Elkana, Shaul Lev‐Ran
Year: 2017
Topic(s):
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
,
Measures See topic collection
,
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
253
Evaluation of a care coordination measure for the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) Medicare survey.
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Ron D. Hays, Steven Martino, Julie A. Brown, Mike Cui, Paul Cleary, Sarah Gaillot, Marc Elliott
Year: 2014
Topic(s):
General Literature See topic collection
,
Measures See topic collection
254
Evaluation of a mindfulness-based intervention with and without virtual reality dialectical behavior therapy® mindfulness skills training for the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder in primary care: A pilot study
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Mar Navarro-Haro, Marta Modrego-Alarcón, Hunter G. Hoffman, Alba Lopez-Montoyo, Mayte Navarro-Gil, Jes Montero-Marin, Azucena García-Palacios, Luis Borao, Javier Garcia-Campayo
Year: 2019
Topic(s):
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
,
Measures See topic collection
255
Evaluation of a Pilot Intervention to Reduce Mental Health and Addiction Stigma in Primary Care Settings
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Akwatu Khenti, Sireesha J. Bobbili, Jaime C. Sapag
Year: 2019
Publication Place: New York
Topic(s):
Measures See topic collection
,
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
256
Evaluation of an Adapted Collaborative Care Model for Older Adult Depression Severity Reduction and Quality of Life Improvement
Type: Journal Article
Authors: V. R. Bench, M. Beach, D. Ren
Year: 2020
Publication Place: United States
Abstract:

PURPOSE: The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the efficacy of a collaborative care model in the reduction of depression severity and the improvement of quality of life (QOL) of older adults. METHODS: Individual participant encounters were conducted approximately every 2 weeks over 4 months with nineteen participants. Average participant age was 73 years. A pre-experimental single pretest-posttest group was conducted in which the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) and Quality of Life Assessment (QOLA) scores respectively measured depression severity and QOL of participants. RESULTS: The average PHQ-9 score (0-27; higher indicates worse depression) decreased from 14 pre-intervention to 8.3 post-intervention (p < .001), while the average QOLA score (0-10; higher indicates better QOL) increased from 5.7 pre-intervention to 6.5 post-intervention (p = .342). CONCLUSION: The adapted collaborative care model provided an affordable, effective method of older adult depression management within the contexts of this clinical study.

Topic(s):
Financing & Sustainability See topic collection
,
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
,
Measures See topic collection
257
Evaluation of an Electronic Health Record (EHR) Tool for Integrated Behavioral Health in Primary Care
Type: Journal Article
Authors: K. K. Jetelina, T. T. Woodson, R. Gunn, B. Muller, K. D. Clark, J. E. DeVoe, B. A. Balasubramanian, D. J. Cohen
Year: 2018
Publication Place: United States
Topic(s):
HIT & Telehealth See topic collection
,
Measures See topic collection
258
Evaluation of buprenorphine dosage adequacy in opioid receptor agonist substitution therapy for heroin dependence: first use of the BUprenorphine-naloxone Dosage Adequacy eVAluation (BUDAVA) questionnaire
Type: Journal Article
Authors: A. D'Amore, F. Romano, V. Biancolillo, G. Lauro, C. Armenante, A. Pizzirusso, S. Del Tufo, C. Ruoppolo, F. Auriemma, F. Cassese, P. Oliva, P. Amato
Year: 2012
Publication Place: New Zealand
Abstract: BACKGROUND: The dosing of opioid receptor agonist medications adequately and on an individual basis is crucial in the pharmacotherapy of opioid dependence. Clinical tools that are able to measure dose appropriateness are sorely needed. The recently developed and validated Opiate Dosage Adequacy Scale (ODAS) comprehensively evaluates the main outcomes relevant for methadone dose optimization, namely relapse, cross-tolerance, objective and subjective withdrawal symptoms, craving and overdose. Based on the ODAS, we developed a new assessment tool (BUprenorphine-naloxone Dosage Adequacy eVAluation [BUDAVA]) for evaluating dosage adequacy in patients in treatment with buprenorphine-naloxone. OBJECTIVE: The main goal of this observational study was to explore whether the BUDAVA questionnaire could be used to assess buprenorphine-based, long-term substitution therapy for heroin addiction. METHODS: The study included heroin-dependent patients who had been in treatment with buprenorphine-naloxone for at least 3 months. Patients (n = 196) were recruited from 11 drug abuse treatment centres in Italy. Dosage adequacy was assessed with the BUDAVA questionnaire. Patients classified as inadequately treated had their dosage modified. After 1 week, they were again administered the questionnaire to assess the adequacy of the new dosage. RESULTS: The buprenorphine-naloxone dosage was found to be inadequate in 61 of the 196 patients. In 13 patients, the treatment scored as inadequate only in the subjective withdrawal symptoms item of the questionnaire and therefore no dosage adjustment was made in the 2 weeks that have characterized this work. The remaining 48 inadequately treated patients had their dosage modified (42 dose increases and six dose decreases). After 1 week on the modified dosage, in 24 of these patients the new regimen was found by the assessment with the questionnaire to be adequate. CONCLUSION: These preliminary results suggest that the BUDAVA questionnaire may be useful for guiding buprenorphine-naloxone maintenance dose adjustments in heroin-dependent patients.
Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
,
Measures See topic collection
259
Evaluation of functional status among patients undergoing maintenance treatments for opioid use disorders
Type: Journal Article
Authors: J. J. Ruíz Ruíz, J. M. Martinez Delgado, N. García-Marchena, ANDOPIO Study Group
Year: 2021
Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Methadone and buprenorphine are the most prevalent types of opioid maintenance programs in Andalusia. The main objective is comparing the functional status of patients with pharmacological opioid maintenance treatments according to different socio-demographic characteristic, health and disabilities domains and sexual difficulties. METHODS: A total of 593 patients from the Andalusia community, 329 were undergoing methadone treatment and 264 were undergoing buprenorphine treatment. The patients were interviewed by socio-demographic and opioid-related variables, assessed by functioning, disability and health domains (WHODAS 2.0.) and for sexual problems (PRSexDQ-SALSEX). RESULTS: We found significant differences in the socio-demographic and the opioid-related variables as the onset of opioid use, being on previous maintenance programs, opioid intravenous use, the length of previous maintenance programs, polydrug use and elevated seroprevalence rates (HCV and HIV) between the methadone group and the buprenorphine group. Regarding health and disability domains there were differences in the Understanding and communication domain, Getting around domain, Participation in society domain and in the WHODAS 2.0. simple and complex score, favoring buprenorphine-treated patients. The methadone group referred elevated sexual impairments compared with the buprenorphine group. Opioid-related variables as seroprevalence rates, other previous lifetime maintenance program, the daily opioid dosage and the daily alcohol use are the most discriminative variables between both groups. Participation in society variables and sexual problems were the most important clinical variables in distinguishing the methadone group from the buprenorphine group regarding their functional status. CONCLUSIONS: The methadone group showed higher prevalence in opioid dependence-related variables, elevated disabilities in participation in society activities and sexual problems compared with the buprenorphine group. This study shows the importance of carry out a functional evaluation in the healthcare follow-up, especially in those areas related with social activity and with sexual problems.

Topic(s):
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
,
Measures See topic collection
,
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
260
Evaluation of Resident Physicians' Knowledge Of and Attitudes Towards Prescribing Buprenorphine for Patients with Opioid Use Disorder
Type: Journal Article
Authors: B. Shuey, D. Lee, I. Ugalde, S. Borgan, C. Bresnan, M. Qureshi, R. Mhaskar, A. Oxner
Year: 2020
Publication Place: United States
Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To determine internal medicine (IM) residents' knowledge of, attitudes towards, and barriers to prescribing buprenorphine for opioid use disorder (OUD). METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of IM residents across all 35 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) accredited Florida IM residency programs. We used an online survey to collect information about resident demographics, substance use curriculums, career interests, content knowledge about diagnosing and managing OUD, and attitudes about and barriers to prescribing buprenorphine for OUD. We used Chi-square test to explore differences in interest in prescribing buprenorphine. We created a composite knowledge score and investigated distribution of knowledge among characteristics via Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: There were 161 participants (response rate 16.0%, n = 1008) across 35 programs Seventy-seven percent of residents provided care for patients with OUD more than once per month. Seventy-four percent report no buprenorphine prescribing training. Higher knowledge scores, interest in primary care, being an intern, and caring for patients with OUD more than monthly were associated with interest in obtaining a buprenorphine waiver (P < 0.05). Limited knowledge about OUD was the most important barrier to prescribing buprenorphine. Eighty-nine percent support legislation to deregulate buprenorphine. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge about managing OUD was poor and represented the most commonly cited barrier to prescribing buprenorphine. Residents want to expand their role in treating OUD. Our findings warrant incorporating addiction medicine into residency curriculum standards. Legislation removing the buprenorphine waiver requirement may increase the number of resident buprenorphine prescribers and improve treatment options for patients with opioid addiction.

Topic(s):
Education & Workforce See topic collection
,
Measures See topic collection
,
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection