TY - JOUR KW - Adolescent KW - Adult KW - Aged KW - Cooperative Behavior KW - Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration KW - Female KW - Health Resources KW - Humans KW - Integrated Health Care Systems KW - Interprofessional Relations KW - Long-Term Care/organization & administration KW - long-term conditions KW - Male KW - Middle Aged KW - national health policy KW - Social Work/organization & administration KW - State Medicine/organization & administration KW - Systematic Review KW - United Kingdom KW - Young Adult AU - S. Mackie AU - A. Darvill A1 - AB - BACKGROUND: In spite of ongoing UK Government recommendations for integrated health and social care, the implementation has been slow. While there are pockets of integration happening across England, many services remain isolated and fragmented. AIM: This review aims to critically review existing evidence to identify if there are any factors enabling successful implementation of integrated health and social care for people with long-term conditions in the community. METHOD: A review was conducted following the principles of a systematic review. Relevant data was extracted from the identified papers and the papers were quality appraised. RESULTS: A total of seven studies were included in the review. Data analysis and synthesis identified a number of themes in relation to enablers of integrated care, including co-location of teams, communication, integrated organisations, management and leadership, capacity and resources, and information technology. CONCLUSION: There is a limited amount of evidence regarding integrated health and social care teams. Although there are some consistencies within the findings, further research is needed to enhance the validity of the body of evidence available. BT - British journal of community nursing C5 - General Literature CP - 2 CY - England DO - 10.12968/bjcn.2016.21.2.82 IS - 2 JF - British journal of community nursing N2 - BACKGROUND: In spite of ongoing UK Government recommendations for integrated health and social care, the implementation has been slow. While there are pockets of integration happening across England, many services remain isolated and fragmented. AIM: This review aims to critically review existing evidence to identify if there are any factors enabling successful implementation of integrated health and social care for people with long-term conditions in the community. METHOD: A review was conducted following the principles of a systematic review. Relevant data was extracted from the identified papers and the papers were quality appraised. RESULTS: A total of seven studies were included in the review. Data analysis and synthesis identified a number of themes in relation to enablers of integrated care, including co-location of teams, communication, integrated organisations, management and leadership, capacity and resources, and information technology. CONCLUSION: There is a limited amount of evidence regarding integrated health and social care teams. Although there are some consistencies within the findings, further research is needed to enhance the validity of the body of evidence available. PP - England PY - 2016 SN - 1462-4753; 1462-4753 SP - 82 EP - 87 EP - T1 - Factors enabling implementation of integrated health and social care: a systematic review T2 - British journal of community nursing TI - Factors enabling implementation of integrated health and social care: a systematic review U1 - General Literature U2 - 26844602 U3 - 10.12968/bjcn.2016.21.2.82 VL - 21 VO - 1462-4753; 1462-4753 Y1 - 2016 ER -