TY - JOUR
AU - E. Turi
AU - S. E. Courtwright
AU - J. Dixon
AU - I. O'Neill
AU - M. Marchiano
AU - L. Poghosyan
A1 - 
AB - Rural populations rely on primary care services for depression care due to shortages and maldistributions of specialty mental health care favoring urban areas. Yet, it is unknown which primary care models are effective at reducing depressive symptoms and emergency department (ED) use for depression among rural populations. The purpose of this systematic review is to synthesize the effectiveness of primary care models on depressive symptoms and ED utilization for depression in rural populations. PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and reference lists of included studies were searched. Eligible articles focused on the impact of primary care models on depressive symptoms or ED utilization for depression among rural populations in the United States. Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria. Three care models were identified in the studies, including collaborative care (i.e., team-based integrated care that tracks patient populations with a registry; n = 7), tele-psychotherapy (i.e., identification of patients in primary care and referral to virtual psychotherapy; n = 6), or self-management support (i.e., identification of patients in primary care and referral to community support for depression self-management; n = 4). These care models were associated with improved patient-reported depressive symptoms such as Patient-Health Questionnaire reported remission of depression (score < 5). No studies assessed depression ED utilization as an outcome. Collaborative care, tele-psychotherapy, and self-management support may be effective at reducing depressive symptoms, specifically in rural populations and should be implemented at the practice level. Research focused on primary care models and ED utilization for depression among rural populations is needed.
AD - Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY.; Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY.
AN - 39246454
BT - Rural Ment Health
C5 - Education & Workforce; HIT & Telehealth
CP - 3
DA - Jul
DO - 10.1037/rmh0000261
DP - NLM
ET - 20240404
IS - 3
JF - Rural Ment Health
LA - eng
N2 - Rural populations rely on primary care services for depression care due to shortages and maldistributions of specialty mental health care favoring urban areas. Yet, it is unknown which primary care models are effective at reducing depressive symptoms and emergency department (ED) use for depression among rural populations. The purpose of this systematic review is to synthesize the effectiveness of primary care models on depressive symptoms and ED utilization for depression in rural populations. PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and reference lists of included studies were searched. Eligible articles focused on the impact of primary care models on depressive symptoms or ED utilization for depression among rural populations in the United States. Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria. Three care models were identified in the studies, including collaborative care (i.e., team-based integrated care that tracks patient populations with a registry; n = 7), tele-psychotherapy (i.e., identification of patients in primary care and referral to virtual psychotherapy; n = 6), or self-management support (i.e., identification of patients in primary care and referral to community support for depression self-management; n = 4). These care models were associated with improved patient-reported depressive symptoms such as Patient-Health Questionnaire reported remission of depression (score < 5). No studies assessed depression ED utilization as an outcome. Collaborative care, tele-psychotherapy, and self-management support may be effective at reducing depressive symptoms, specifically in rural populations and should be implemented at the practice level. Research focused on primary care models and ED utilization for depression among rural populations is needed.
PY - 2024
SN - 1935-942X (Print); 1935-942x
SP - 145
EP - 155+
ST - Primary Care Models and Depression Outcomes in Rural Adult Populations: A Systematic Review
T1 - Primary Care Models and Depression Outcomes in Rural Adult Populations: A Systematic Review
T2 - Rural Ment Health
TI - Primary Care Models and Depression Outcomes in Rural Adult Populations: A Systematic Review
U1 - Education & Workforce; HIT & Telehealth
U3 - 10.1037/rmh0000261
VL - 48
VO - 1935-942X (Print); 1935-942x
Y1 - 2024
ER -