TY - JOUR AU - S. Aryasinghe AU - P. Averill AU - C. Waithe AU - S. Ibuanokpe AU - R. Newby-Mayers AU - N. Lakhdar AU - Amine Sylla AU - E. Cox AU - S. Das AU - E. Mayer A1 - AB - BACKGROUND: Ethnic inequities in maternity care persist in England for Black, African, Caribbean and mixed-Black heritage families, resulting in poorer care experiences and health outcomes than other minoritised ethnic groups. Co-production using an integrated care approach is crucial for reducing these disparities and improving care quality and safety. Therefore, this study aimed to understand the alignment of health and local authority professional perspectives with community needs on how to improve maternity experiences for this ethnic group within a London integrated care system (ICS). METHODS: Between March and June 2024, five workshops were conducted with health professionals, local authorities, voluntary, community and social enterprise (VCSE) sector and the public from Black, African, Caribbean and mixed-Black heritage backgrounds across the North West London ICS. Using the nominal group technique (NGT), attendees prioritised ideas to improve the experience of maternity care for families from Black, African, Caribbean and mixed-Black heritage backgrounds, which were thematically synthesised using framework analysis. RESULTS: Fifty-four attendees, covering primary, secondary, regional and national health professionals, public health teams from three local authorities, VCSE sector and the public, generated 89 potential interventions across 11 themes. All attendees prioritised improving staff knowledge and capacity in culturally competent care and communication. Community-identified needs for advocacy mechanisms and mental health support throughout the maternity pathway were not reflected in professional priorities. CONCLUSION: The study highlights the need for an integrated, community-centred approach beyond hospital settings when addressing ethnic inequities in maternity care, recognising key differences between community and professional priorities within an ICS. Leveraging lived experience expertise to lead the NGT community workshops was essential in building trust and buy-in of the overall prioritisation process. AD - NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, Imperial College London, London, UK s.aryasinghe@imperial.ac.uk.; NIHR North West London Patient Safety Research Collaboration, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK.; Lived Experience Expert, Imperial College London, London, UK.; Mamas House CIC, London, UK.; Apricot Wellbeing CIC, London, UK.; Listen to Act, London, UK.; London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham, London, UK.; Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.; NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, Imperial College London, London, UK. AN - 39603799 BT - BMJ Qual Saf C5 - Healthcare Disparities; Education & Workforce CP - 5 DA - Apr 17 DO - 10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017848 DP - NLM ET - 20250417 IS - 5 JF - BMJ Qual Saf LA - eng N2 - BACKGROUND: Ethnic inequities in maternity care persist in England for Black, African, Caribbean and mixed-Black heritage families, resulting in poorer care experiences and health outcomes than other minoritised ethnic groups. Co-production using an integrated care approach is crucial for reducing these disparities and improving care quality and safety. Therefore, this study aimed to understand the alignment of health and local authority professional perspectives with community needs on how to improve maternity experiences for this ethnic group within a London integrated care system (ICS). METHODS: Between March and June 2024, five workshops were conducted with health professionals, local authorities, voluntary, community and social enterprise (VCSE) sector and the public from Black, African, Caribbean and mixed-Black heritage backgrounds across the North West London ICS. Using the nominal group technique (NGT), attendees prioritised ideas to improve the experience of maternity care for families from Black, African, Caribbean and mixed-Black heritage backgrounds, which were thematically synthesised using framework analysis. RESULTS: Fifty-four attendees, covering primary, secondary, regional and national health professionals, public health teams from three local authorities, VCSE sector and the public, generated 89 potential interventions across 11 themes. All attendees prioritised improving staff knowledge and capacity in culturally competent care and communication. Community-identified needs for advocacy mechanisms and mental health support throughout the maternity pathway were not reflected in professional priorities. CONCLUSION: The study highlights the need for an integrated, community-centred approach beyond hospital settings when addressing ethnic inequities in maternity care, recognising key differences between community and professional priorities within an ICS. Leveraging lived experience expertise to lead the NGT community workshops was essential in building trust and buy-in of the overall prioritisation process. PY - 2025 SN - 2044-5415 (Print); 2044-5415 SP - 305 EP - 316+ ST - Improving the maternity experience for Black, African, Caribbean and mixed-Black families in an integrated care system: a multigroup community and interprofessional co-production prioritisation exercise using nominal group technique T1 - Improving the maternity experience for Black, African, Caribbean and mixed-Black families in an integrated care system: a multigroup community and interprofessional co-production prioritisation exercise using nominal group technique T2 - BMJ Qual Saf TI - Improving the maternity experience for Black, African, Caribbean and mixed-Black families in an integrated care system: a multigroup community and interprofessional co-production prioritisation exercise using nominal group technique U1 - Healthcare Disparities; Education & Workforce U3 - 10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017848 VL - 34 VO - 2044-5415 (Print); 2044-5415 Y1 - 2025 ER -