TY - JOUR KW - Buprenorphine/therapeutic use KW - Delivery of Health Care KW - Harm Reduction KW - Humans KW - Opiate Substitution Treatment KW - Opioid-Related Disorders/drug therapy KW - Low threshold KW - buprenorphine KW - co-located KW - integrated care KW - qualitative KW - Stakeholders AU - S. N. Kapadia AU - J. L. Griffin AU - J. Waldman AU - N. R. Ziebarth AU - B. R. Schackman AU - C. N. Behrends A1 - AB - BACKGROUND: To respond to the U.S. opioid crisis, new models of healthcare delivery for opioid use disorder treatment are essential. We used a qualitative approach to describe the implementation of a low-threshold buprenorphine treatment program in an independent, community-based medical practice in Ithaca, NY. METHODS: We conducted 17 semi-structured interviews with program staff, leadership, and external stakeholders. Then we analyzed these data using content analysis. We used purposeful sampling aiming for variation in job title for program staff, and in organizational affiliation for external stakeholders. RESULTS: We found that opening an independent medical practice allowed for low-threshold buprenorphine treatment with less regulatory oversight, but state-certification was ultimately required to ensure financial sustainability. Relying on health insurance reimbursement alone led to funding shortfalls and additional funding sources were also required. The practice's ability to build relationships with licensed substance use treatment programs, community organizations, the legal system, and government agencies in the region differed depending on how much these entities supported a harm reduction philosophy compared to abstinence-based treatment. Finally, expanding the practice to a second location in a different region, co-located with a syringe service program, required adapting to a new cultural and political environment. CONCLUSION: The results from this study provide insight about the challenges that independent medical practices might face in delivering low-threshold buprenorphine treatment. They support policy efforts to address the financial burdens associated with providing low-threshold buprenorphine therapy and inform the external relationships that other providers would need to consider when delivering novel treatment models. AD - Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.; Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.; REACH Medical, Ithaca, New York, USA.; REACH Medical, Ithaca, New York, USA.; Department of Policy Analysis and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.; Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.; Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA. BT - Substance use & misuse C5 - Education & Workforce; Opioids & Substance Use CP - 2 DO - 10.1080/10826084.2021.2012484 IS - 2 JF - Substance use & misuse LA - eng M1 - Journal Article N2 - BACKGROUND: To respond to the U.S. opioid crisis, new models of healthcare delivery for opioid use disorder treatment are essential. We used a qualitative approach to describe the implementation of a low-threshold buprenorphine treatment program in an independent, community-based medical practice in Ithaca, NY. METHODS: We conducted 17 semi-structured interviews with program staff, leadership, and external stakeholders. Then we analyzed these data using content analysis. We used purposeful sampling aiming for variation in job title for program staff, and in organizational affiliation for external stakeholders. RESULTS: We found that opening an independent medical practice allowed for low-threshold buprenorphine treatment with less regulatory oversight, but state-certification was ultimately required to ensure financial sustainability. Relying on health insurance reimbursement alone led to funding shortfalls and additional funding sources were also required. The practice's ability to build relationships with licensed substance use treatment programs, community organizations, the legal system, and government agencies in the region differed depending on how much these entities supported a harm reduction philosophy compared to abstinence-based treatment. Finally, expanding the practice to a second location in a different region, co-located with a syringe service program, required adapting to a new cultural and political environment. CONCLUSION: The results from this study provide insight about the challenges that independent medical practices might face in delivering low-threshold buprenorphine treatment. They support policy efforts to address the financial burdens associated with providing low-threshold buprenorphine therapy and inform the external relationships that other providers would need to consider when delivering novel treatment models. PY - 2022 SN - 1532-2491; 1082-6084; 1082-6084 SP - 308 EP - 315 EP - T1 - The Experience of Implementing a Low-Threshold Buprenorphine Treatment Program in a Non-Urban Medical Practice T2 - Substance use & misuse TI - The Experience of Implementing a Low-Threshold Buprenorphine Treatment Program in a Non-Urban Medical Practice U1 - Education & Workforce; Opioids & Substance Use U2 - 34889691 U3 - 10.1080/10826084.2021.2012484 VL - 57 VO - 1532-2491; 1082-6084; 1082-6084 Y1 - 2022 ER -