TY - JOUR KW - integrated primary care KW - Inter-professional collaboration KW - Mixed Methods AU - J. E. Kaitz AU - S. Ray A1 - AB - In recent years, the subject of integrated healthcare, including the integration of behavioral health services into primary care, within the healthcare field has been increasingly of interest to researchers, providers, and policy makers. However, little is known about the experiences of providers within integrated care and the impact of these experiences on inter-professional relationships and collaboration. The researchers aimed to explore differences in providers' perspectives, including inter-professional collaboration and overall job satisfaction, by provider type and level of integration. The current study uses a mixed method exploratory approach, gathering both qualitative and quantitative data to investigate the perspectives of providers (both psychologists and physicians) on their work together. This study included 30 psychologists and 30 primary care physicians from three levels of healthcare integration (traditional/coordinated, co-located, and integrated). As hypothesized, results indicated that providers in integrated settings were the most satisfied with their collaboration with other providers. Furthermore, the providers' narratives revealed promising insights which contribute to a broader understanding of how to improve the relationships between psychologists and primary care physicians in integrated healthcare and other settings. AD - Department of Psychology, Suffolk University, 73 Tremont Street, Boston, MA, 02108, USA. jkaitz@su.suffolk.edu.; Department of Psychology, Suffolk University, 73 Tremont Street, Boston, MA, 02108, USA. BT - Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings C5 - Education & Workforce CY - United States DO - 10.1007/s10880-020-09733-5 JF - Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings LA - eng M1 - Journal Article N2 - In recent years, the subject of integrated healthcare, including the integration of behavioral health services into primary care, within the healthcare field has been increasingly of interest to researchers, providers, and policy makers. However, little is known about the experiences of providers within integrated care and the impact of these experiences on inter-professional relationships and collaboration. The researchers aimed to explore differences in providers' perspectives, including inter-professional collaboration and overall job satisfaction, by provider type and level of integration. The current study uses a mixed method exploratory approach, gathering both qualitative and quantitative data to investigate the perspectives of providers (both psychologists and physicians) on their work together. This study included 30 psychologists and 30 primary care physicians from three levels of healthcare integration (traditional/coordinated, co-located, and integrated). As hypothesized, results indicated that providers in integrated settings were the most satisfied with their collaboration with other providers. Furthermore, the providers' narratives revealed promising insights which contribute to a broader understanding of how to improve the relationships between psychologists and primary care physicians in integrated healthcare and other settings. PP - United States PY - 2020 SN - 1573-3572; 1068-9583 T1 - Psychologist and Physician Inter-Professional Collaborative Experiences in Primary Care Integration T2 - Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings TI - Psychologist and Physician Inter-Professional Collaborative Experiences in Primary Care Integration U1 - Education & Workforce U2 - 32691192 U3 - 10.1007/s10880-020-09733-5 VO - 1573-3572; 1068-9583 Y1 - 2020 Y2 - Jul 20 ER -