TY - JOUR
AU - N. Janich
AU - Vazquez Arreola
A1 - 
AB - Providing primary care services in behavioral health settings has become more common and necessary given the needs of individuals with serious mental illness (SMI). In this exploratory study, we developed a survey to assess agency and professional staff and practitioner capacity for coordinated care. The survey provides a feedback mechanism for agencies to target staff and organizational needs related to building capacity to provide coordinated care. Logistic regressions compared differences in 24 dimensions of coordinated care specifically comparing capacity based on professional role (behavioral health and medical), model of coordination (co-located and fully integrated), and time of model adoption (early and late adopters). Findings indicated that all three were significant predictors of capacity in multiple dimensions suggesting the need for training and planning around inter-professional and inter-agency coordination.
AD - Center for Applied Behavioral Health Policy, Arizona State University, 618 N. Central Avenue, Suite 100, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA. njanich@asu.edu.; Center for Applied Behavioral Health Policy, Arizona State University, 618 N. Central Avenue, Suite 100, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA.
BT - The journal of behavioral health services & research
C5 - Education & Workforce; Healthcare Disparities
CP - 4
CY - United States
DO - 10.1007/s11414-020-09708-2
IS - 4
JF - The journal of behavioral health services & research
LA - eng
M1 - Journal Article
N2 - Providing primary care services in behavioral health settings has become more common and necessary given the needs of individuals with serious mental illness (SMI). In this exploratory study, we developed a survey to assess agency and professional staff and practitioner capacity for coordinated care. The survey provides a feedback mechanism for agencies to target staff and organizational needs related to building capacity to provide coordinated care. Logistic regressions compared differences in 24 dimensions of coordinated care specifically comparing capacity based on professional role (behavioral health and medical), model of coordination (co-located and fully integrated), and time of model adoption (early and late adopters). Findings indicated that all three were significant predictors of capacity in multiple dimensions suggesting the need for training and planning around inter-professional and inter-agency coordination.
PP - United States
PY - 2020
SN - 1556-3308; 1094-3412
SP - 476
EP - 492
EP - 
T1 - Staff and Organizational Capacity in the Implementation of Coordinated Care: an Examination of 10 Behavioral Health Agencies in Rural Communities
T2 - The journal of behavioral health services & research
TI - Staff and Organizational Capacity in the Implementation of Coordinated Care: an Examination of 10 Behavioral Health Agencies in Rural Communities
U1 - Education & Workforce; Healthcare Disparities
U2 - 32445020
U3 - 10.1007/s11414-020-09708-2
VL - 47
VO - 1556-3308; 1094-3412
Y1 - 2020
Y2 - Oct
ER -