TY - JOUR KW - Adult KW - Aged KW - Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control KW - England KW - Female KW - Health Services Accessibility KW - Humans KW - Male KW - Mental Disorders/epidemiology KW - Middle Aged KW - Primary Health Care/organization & administration KW - Qualitative Research KW - Risk Reduction Behavior KW - Young Adult KW - barriers KW - cardiovascular disease KW - Facilitators KW - implementation science KW - Normalisation process theory KW - nurse KW - Physical Health KW - primary care KW - qualitative KW - severe mental illness AU - S. Hassan AU - S. Heinkel AU - A. Burton AU - R. Blackburn AU - T. McCloud AU - J. Ross AU - D. Osborn AU - K. Walters A1 - AB - BACKGROUND: People with severe mental illness (SMI) are at greater risk of earlier mortality due to physical health problems including cardiovascular disease (CVD). There is limited work exploring whether physical health interventions for people with SMI can be embedded and/or adopted within specific healthcare settings. This information is necessary to optimise the development of services and interventions within healthcare settings. This study explores the barriers and facilitators of implementing a nurse-delivered intervention ('PRIMROSE') designed to reduce CVD risk in people with SMI in primary care, using Normalisation Process Theory (NPT), a theory that explains the dynamics of embedding or 'normalising' a complex intervention within healthcare settings. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted between April-December 2016 with patients with SMI at risk of CVD who received the PRIMROSE intervention, and practice nurses and healthcare assistants who delivered it in primary care in England. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis. Emergent themes were then mapped on to constructs of NPT. RESULTS: Fifteen patients and 15 staff participated. The implementation of PRIMROSE was affected by the following as categorised by the NPT domains: 1) Coherence, where both staff and patients expressed an understanding of the purpose and value of the intervention, 2) Cognitive participation, including mental health stigma and staff perceptions of the compatibility of the intervention to primary care contexts, 3) Collective action, including 3.1. Interactional workability in terms of lack of patient engagement despite flexible appointment scheduling. The structured nature of the intervention and the need for additional nurse time were considered barriers, 3.2. Relational integration i.e. whereby positive relationships between staff and patients facilitated implementation, and access to 'in-house' staff support was considered important, 3.3. Skill-set workability in terms of staff skills, knowledge and training facilitated implementation, 3.4. Contextual integration regarding the accessibility of resources sometimes prevented collective action. 4) Reflexive monitoring, where the staff commonly appraised the intervention by suggesting designated timeslots and technology may improve the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Future interventions for physical health in people with SMI could consider the following items to improve implementation: 1) training for practitioners in CVD risk prevention to increase practitioners knowledge of physical interventions 2) training in SMI to increase practitioner confidence to engage with people with SMI and reduce mental health stigma and 3) access to resources including specialist services, additional staff and time. Access to specialist behaviour change services may be beneficial for patients with specific health goals. Additional staff to support workload and share knowledge may also be valuable. More time for appointments with people with SMI may allow practitioners to better meet patient needs. AD - Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, Upper Third Floor, UCL Medical School (Royal Free Campus), Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK. suzan.hassan@ucl.ac.uk.; Division of Psychiatry, University College London, 6th Floor, Wing B, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.; Division of Psychiatry, University College London, 6th Floor, Wing B, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.; Division of Psychiatry, University College London, 6th Floor, Wing B, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.; Division of Psychiatry, University College London, 6th Floor, Wing B, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.; Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, Upper Third Floor, UCL Medical School (Royal Free Campus), Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK.; Division of Psychiatry, University College London, 6th Floor, Wing B, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.; Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, 4 St Pancras Way, London, NW1 0PE, UK.; Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, Upper Third Floor, UCL Medical School (Royal Free Campus), Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK. BT - BMC health services research C5 - Education & Workforce; Healthcare Disparities CP - 1 DO - 10.1186/s12913-020-05643-2 IS - 1 JF - BMC health services research LA - eng M1 - Journal Article N2 - BACKGROUND: People with severe mental illness (SMI) are at greater risk of earlier mortality due to physical health problems including cardiovascular disease (CVD). There is limited work exploring whether physical health interventions for people with SMI can be embedded and/or adopted within specific healthcare settings. This information is necessary to optimise the development of services and interventions within healthcare settings. This study explores the barriers and facilitators of implementing a nurse-delivered intervention ('PRIMROSE') designed to reduce CVD risk in people with SMI in primary care, using Normalisation Process Theory (NPT), a theory that explains the dynamics of embedding or 'normalising' a complex intervention within healthcare settings. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted between April-December 2016 with patients with SMI at risk of CVD who received the PRIMROSE intervention, and practice nurses and healthcare assistants who delivered it in primary care in England. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis. Emergent themes were then mapped on to constructs of NPT. RESULTS: Fifteen patients and 15 staff participated. The implementation of PRIMROSE was affected by the following as categorised by the NPT domains: 1) Coherence, where both staff and patients expressed an understanding of the purpose and value of the intervention, 2) Cognitive participation, including mental health stigma and staff perceptions of the compatibility of the intervention to primary care contexts, 3) Collective action, including 3.1. Interactional workability in terms of lack of patient engagement despite flexible appointment scheduling. The structured nature of the intervention and the need for additional nurse time were considered barriers, 3.2. Relational integration i.e. whereby positive relationships between staff and patients facilitated implementation, and access to 'in-house' staff support was considered important, 3.3. Skill-set workability in terms of staff skills, knowledge and training facilitated implementation, 3.4. Contextual integration regarding the accessibility of resources sometimes prevented collective action. 4) Reflexive monitoring, where the staff commonly appraised the intervention by suggesting designated timeslots and technology may improve the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Future interventions for physical health in people with SMI could consider the following items to improve implementation: 1) training for practitioners in CVD risk prevention to increase practitioners knowledge of physical interventions 2) training in SMI to increase practitioner confidence to engage with people with SMI and reduce mental health stigma and 3) access to resources including specialist services, additional staff and time. Access to specialist behaviour change services may be beneficial for patients with specific health goals. Additional staff to support workload and share knowledge may also be valuable. More time for appointments with people with SMI may allow practitioners to better meet patient needs. PY - 2020 SN - 1472-6963; 1472-6963 SP - 753 T1 - A qualitative study exploring the barriers and facilitators of implementing a cardiovascular disease risk reducing intervention for people with severe mental illness into primary care contexts across England: the 'PRIMROSE' trial T2 - BMC health services research TI - A qualitative study exploring the barriers and facilitators of implementing a cardiovascular disease risk reducing intervention for people with severe mental illness into primary care contexts across England: the 'PRIMROSE' trial U1 - Education & Workforce; Healthcare Disparities U2 - 32799925 U3 - 10.1186/s12913-020-05643-2 VL - 20 VO - 1472-6963; 1472-6963 Y1 - 2020 Y2 - Aug 15 ER -