TY - JOUR
KW - Adult
KW - Amphetamine-Related Disorders/prevention & control
KW - Behavior Therapy/methods
KW - HIV Infections/prevention & control
KW - Homosexuality, Male
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Methamphetamine/adverse effects
KW - Risk-Taking
KW - Behavioral interventions
KW - Contingency management
KW - Methamphetamine
AU - K. F. Corsi
AU - S. Shoptaw
AU - M. Alishahi
AU - R. E. Booth
A1 - 
AB - PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This paper reports on the results of a study comparing two behavioral treatments for methamphetamine users. The outcome was the effectiveness of the interventions in reducing meth use. The interventions were contingency management (CM) and contingency management plus strengths-based case management (CM/SBCM). RECENT FINDINGS: CM/SBCM was found to be associated with attending more sessions for people who reported being in a couple. Also, participants who earned more money in the first part of the study were more likely to have more clean urinalysis in the second part of the study. Latent class analysis identified a class of participants who were in a couple, without sexual abuse history, and less meth use at baseline. This class tended to have more clean urinalysis in the CM/SBCM intervention. These results indicate that incentive-based interventions with case management may be useful for helping meth users reduce their drug use.
AD - Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 1557 Ogden St., Denver, CO, 80218, USA. Karen.corsi@ucdenver.edu.; Departments of Family Medicine and Psychiatry, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.; Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 1557 Ogden St., Denver, CO, 80218, USA.; Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 1557 Ogden St., Denver, CO, 80218, USA.
BT - Current HIV/AIDS reports
C5 - Opioids & Substance Use; Healthcare Disparities
CP - 1
DO - 10.1007/s11904-019-00423-y
IS - 1
JF - Current HIV/AIDS reports
LA - eng
M1 - Journal Article
N2 - PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This paper reports on the results of a study comparing two behavioral treatments for methamphetamine users. The outcome was the effectiveness of the interventions in reducing meth use. The interventions were contingency management (CM) and contingency management plus strengths-based case management (CM/SBCM). RECENT FINDINGS: CM/SBCM was found to be associated with attending more sessions for people who reported being in a couple. Also, participants who earned more money in the first part of the study were more likely to have more clean urinalysis in the second part of the study. Latent class analysis identified a class of participants who were in a couple, without sexual abuse history, and less meth use at baseline. This class tended to have more clean urinalysis in the CM/SBCM intervention. These results indicate that incentive-based interventions with case management may be useful for helping meth users reduce their drug use.
PY - 2019
SN - 1548-3576; 1548-3568; 1548-3568
SP - 29
EP - 36
EP - 
T1 - Interventions to Reduce Drug Use Among Methamphetamine Users at Risk for HIV
T2 - Current HIV/AIDS reports
TI - Interventions to Reduce Drug Use Among Methamphetamine Users at Risk for HIV
U1 - Opioids & Substance Use; Healthcare Disparities
U2 - 30761465
U3 - 10.1007/s11904-019-00423-y
VL - 16
VO - 1548-3576; 1548-3568; 1548-3568
Y1 - 2019
Y2 - Feb
ER -