TY - JOUR KW - Adolescent KW - Adult KW - Communication KW - Confidence Intervals KW - Correspondence as Topic KW - Female KW - Great Britain KW - Health Promotion/methods KW - Humans KW - Interprofessional Relations KW - Male KW - Mental Disorders KW - Mental Health Services/organization & administration KW - Middle Aged KW - Odds Ratio KW - Physician-Patient Relations KW - Retrospective Studies KW - Severity of Illness Index KW - Time Factors KW - Young Adult AU - S. Hardy AU - R. Gray A1 - AB - BACKGROUND: Annual physical health checks are recommended for patients with severe mental illness (SMI) as this group has a higher risk of developing cardiovascular disease than the rest of the general population. There is little guidance for healthcare professionals to assist them in encouraging patients to attend a health check. AIMS: To explore whether an invitation appointment letter is effective in prompting patients with SMI to attend a physical health check in primary care compared with those with diabetes. METHOD: A retrospective audit comparing the response rate of patients with SMI and diabetes to an appointment letter inviting them to attend a primary care health check. RESULTS: Two-thirds (n = 61, 66%) of the patients with SMI (n = 92) and three-quarters (n = 338, 81%) of those with diabetes (n = 416) attended the practice on the date and time stipulated in the letter. Patients with diabetes were 2.2 times more likely to attend a health check compared with those with SMI (OR = 2.20, 95% CI = 1.13-3.62). CONCLUSION: Although attendance rates were lower than in patients with diabetes, they were higher than expected from the SMI group. An invitation appointment letter is an effective way of ensuring that patients with SMI have a physical health check. BT - Primary health care research & development C5 - Healthcare Disparities CP - 4 CY - England DO - 10.1017/S1463423612000023 IS - 4 JF - Primary health care research & development N2 - BACKGROUND: Annual physical health checks are recommended for patients with severe mental illness (SMI) as this group has a higher risk of developing cardiovascular disease than the rest of the general population. There is little guidance for healthcare professionals to assist them in encouraging patients to attend a health check. AIMS: To explore whether an invitation appointment letter is effective in prompting patients with SMI to attend a physical health check in primary care compared with those with diabetes. METHOD: A retrospective audit comparing the response rate of patients with SMI and diabetes to an appointment letter inviting them to attend a primary care health check. RESULTS: Two-thirds (n = 61, 66%) of the patients with SMI (n = 92) and three-quarters (n = 338, 81%) of those with diabetes (n = 416) attended the practice on the date and time stipulated in the letter. Patients with diabetes were 2.2 times more likely to attend a health check compared with those with SMI (OR = 2.20, 95% CI = 1.13-3.62). CONCLUSION: Although attendance rates were lower than in patients with diabetes, they were higher than expected from the SMI group. An invitation appointment letter is an effective way of ensuring that patients with SMI have a physical health check. PP - England PY - 2012 SN - 1477-1128; 1463-4236 SP - 347 EP - 352 EP - T1 - Is the use of an invitation letter effective in prompting patients with severe mental illness to attend a primary care physical health check? T2 - Primary health care research & development TI - Is the use of an invitation letter effective in prompting patients with severe mental illness to attend a primary care physical health check? U1 - Healthcare Disparities U2 - 22340012 U3 - 10.1017/S1463423612000023 VL - 13 VO - 1477-1128; 1463-4236 Y1 - 2012 ER -