TY - JOUR KW - Comorbidity KW - Humans KW - Models, Psychological KW - Needs Assessment/statistics & numerical data KW - Outcome Assessment (Health Care)/statistics & numerical data KW - Personality Assessment/statistics & numerical data KW - Prognosis KW - Psychometrics/statistics & numerical data KW - Psychophysiologic Disorders/diagnosis/epidemiology/psychology KW - Reproducibility of Results KW - Risk Factors KW - Sick Role KW - Somatoform Disorders/diagnosis/epidemiology/psychology AU - P. de Jonge AU - F. J. Huyse AU - J. P. Slaets AU - W. Sollner AU - F. C. Stiefel A1 - AB - OBJECTIVE: Lack of operationalization of the biopsychosocial model hinders its effective application to the increasingly prevalent problems of comorbidities in clinical presentations. Here, we describe the INTERMED, an instrument to assess biopsychosocial case complexity in general health care, and provide an overview of its psychometric evaluation. METHOD: Review and summary of our publications to date, and re-analysis of findings. RESULTS: The INTERMED has face-validity, is brief and easy to use, and several research reports support its reliability and validity. It has the capacity to detect patients at risk for poor clinical outcome and quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: The INTERMED project is relevant to various agents involved in the care process. It provides a basis for effective multidisciplinary treatment of patients with a high case complexity. BT - The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry C5 - Medically Unexplained Symptoms CP - 9 CY - Australia DO - 10.1111/j.1440-1614.2005.01684.x IS - 9 JF - The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry N2 - OBJECTIVE: Lack of operationalization of the biopsychosocial model hinders its effective application to the increasingly prevalent problems of comorbidities in clinical presentations. Here, we describe the INTERMED, an instrument to assess biopsychosocial case complexity in general health care, and provide an overview of its psychometric evaluation. METHOD: Review and summary of our publications to date, and re-analysis of findings. RESULTS: The INTERMED has face-validity, is brief and easy to use, and several research reports support its reliability and validity. It has the capacity to detect patients at risk for poor clinical outcome and quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: The INTERMED project is relevant to various agents involved in the care process. It provides a basis for effective multidisciplinary treatment of patients with a high case complexity. PP - Australia PY - 2005 SN - 0004-8674; 0004-8674 SP - 795 EP - 799 EP - T1 - Operationalization of biopsychosocial case complexity in general health care: the INTERMED project T2 - The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry TI - Operationalization of biopsychosocial case complexity in general health care: the INTERMED project U1 - Medically Unexplained Symptoms U2 - 16168037 U3 - 10.1111/j.1440-1614.2005.01684.x VL - 39 VO - 0004-8674; 0004-8674 Y1 - 2005 ER -