TY - JOUR AU - K. B. Angstman AU - S. Phelan AU - M. R. Myszkowski AU - K. M. Schak AU - R. S. DeJesus AU - T. W. Lineberry AU - M. van Ryn A1 - AB - BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES:: Racial and ethnic disparities in depression incidence, prevalence, treatment, and outcomes still persist. The hypothesis of this study was that use of collaborative care management (CCM) in treating depressed primary care patients would decrease racial disparities in 6-month clinical outcomes compared with those patients treated with usual primary care (UC). RESEARCH DESIGN/SUBJECTS:: In a retrospective chart review analysis, 3588 (51.2%) patients received UC and 3422 (48.8%) patients were enrolled in CCM. Logistic regression analyses were used to examine disparities in 6-month outcomes. RESULTS:: Minority patients enrolled in CCM were more likely to be participating in depression care at 6 months than minority patients in UC (61.8% vs. 14.4%; P/=10 (3.068; 95% CI, 1.622-5.804; P/=10 (3.068; 95% CI, 1.622-5.804; P/=10 after 6 months, demonstrated no significance of minority status. CONCLUSIONS:: Utilization of CCM for depression was associated with a significant reduction of the disparities for outcomes of compliance, remission, or persistence of depressive symptoms for minority patients with depression versus those treated with UC. BT - Medical care C5 - Healthcare Disparities CP - 1 DO - 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000280 IS - 1 JF - Medical care N2 - BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES:: Racial and ethnic disparities in depression incidence, prevalence, treatment, and outcomes still persist. The hypothesis of this study was that use of collaborative care management (CCM) in treating depressed primary care patients would decrease racial disparities in 6-month clinical outcomes compared with those patients treated with usual primary care (UC). RESEARCH DESIGN/SUBJECTS:: In a retrospective chart review analysis, 3588 (51.2%) patients received UC and 3422 (48.8%) patients were enrolled in CCM. Logistic regression analyses were used to examine disparities in 6-month outcomes. RESULTS:: Minority patients enrolled in CCM were more likely to be participating in depression care at 6 months than minority patients in UC (61.8% vs. 14.4%; P/=10 (3.068; 95% CI, 1.622-5.804; P/=10 (3.068; 95% CI, 1.622-5.804; P/=10 after 6 months, demonstrated no significance of minority status. CONCLUSIONS:: Utilization of CCM for depression was associated with a significant reduction of the disparities for outcomes of compliance, remission, or persistence of depressive symptoms for minority patients with depression versus those treated with UC. PY - 2015 SN - 1537-1948; 0025-7079 SP - 32 EP - 37 EP - T1 - Minority Primary Care Patients With Depression: Outcome Disparities Improve With Collaborative Care Management T2 - Medical care TI - Minority Primary Care Patients With Depression: Outcome Disparities Improve With Collaborative Care Management U1 - Healthcare Disparities U2 - 25464162 U3 - 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000280 VL - 53 VO - 1537-1948; 0025-7079 Y1 - 2015 ER -