TY - JOUR
AU - W. J. Katon
AU - J. E. Russo
AU - M. Von Korff
AU - E. H. Lin
AU - E. Ludman
AU - P. S. Ciechanowski
A1 - 
AB - Abstract. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the 5-year effects on total health care costs of the Pathways depression intervention program for patients with diabetes and comorbid depression compared with usual primary care. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The Pathways Study was conducted in nine primary care practices of a large HMO and enrolled 329 patients with diabetes and comorbid major depression. The current study analyzed the differences in long-term medical costs between intervention and usual care patients. Participants were randomly assigned to a nurse depression intervention (n = 164) or to usual primary care (n = 165). The intervention included education about depression, behavioral activation, and a choice of either starting with support of antidepressant medication treatment by the primary care doctor or problem-solving therapy in primary care. Interventions were provided for up to 12 months, and the main outcome measures are health costs over a 5-year period. RESULTS: Patients in the intervention arm of the study had improved depression outcomes and trends for reduced 5-year mean total medical costs of -$3,907 (95% CI -$15,454 less to $7,640 more) compared with usual care patients. A sensitivity analysis found that these cost differences were largely explained by the patients with depression and the most severe medical comorbidity. CONCLUSIONS: The Pathways depression collaborative care program improved depression outcomes compared with usual care with no evidence of greater long-term costs and with trends for reduced costs among the more severely medically ill patients with diabetes.
BT - Diabetes Care
C5 - Financing & Sustainability
CP - 10
DO - 10.2337/dc08-0032
IS - 10
JF - Diabetes Care
N2 - Abstract. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the 5-year effects on total health care costs of the Pathways depression intervention program for patients with diabetes and comorbid depression compared with usual primary care. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The Pathways Study was conducted in nine primary care practices of a large HMO and enrolled 329 patients with diabetes and comorbid major depression. The current study analyzed the differences in long-term medical costs between intervention and usual care patients. Participants were randomly assigned to a nurse depression intervention (n = 164) or to usual primary care (n = 165). The intervention included education about depression, behavioral activation, and a choice of either starting with support of antidepressant medication treatment by the primary care doctor or problem-solving therapy in primary care. Interventions were provided for up to 12 months, and the main outcome measures are health costs over a 5-year period. RESULTS: Patients in the intervention arm of the study had improved depression outcomes and trends for reduced 5-year mean total medical costs of -$3,907 (95% CI -$15,454 less to $7,640 more) compared with usual care patients. A sensitivity analysis found that these cost differences were largely explained by the patients with depression and the most severe medical comorbidity. CONCLUSIONS: The Pathways depression collaborative care program improved depression outcomes compared with usual care with no evidence of greater long-term costs and with trends for reduced costs among the more severely medically ill patients with diabetes.
PY - 2008
SP - 1036
EP - 1041
EP - 
T1 - Long-term effects on medical costs of improving depression outcomes in patients with depression and diabetes
T2 - Diabetes Care
TI - Long-term effects on medical costs of improving depression outcomes in patients with depression and diabetes
U1 - Financing & Sustainability
U2 - 18332158
U3 - 10.2337/dc08-0032
VL - 21
Y1 - 2008
ER -